IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog
April 2005 (previous | next)
 

Friday, April 29, 2005

FCC Makes Slew of Important Appointments

Some of the most important developments at today's FCC Open Meeting were not the proceedings addressed but the staffing changes announced. Chairman Kevin Martin unveiled several solid appointments to some of the busiest parts of the agency including: Chief of Staff Dan Gonzalez, Legal Advisor Michelle Carey, Consumer Bureau Chief Monica Desai, Enforcement Bureau Chief Kris Monteith and Wireline Bureau Chief Tom Navin. These are veterans who know their way around the FCC and who understand deeply the complex issues the agency faces, particularly with respect to critical issues such as broadband, voice over IP and universal service. They also are some of my favorite people at the Commission. As a former colleague, I couldn't be happier for them.

posted by Kyle Dixon @ 1:51 PM | The FCC

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Another Lesson from a Mad River, Courtesy of Professor Lessig

It's not often that the cable industry can count on help from Lawrence Lessig regarding "network neutrality" -- the question of whether cable modem and other broadband service providers should permit Internet users to access the content, applications and devices of their choice. And yet, Lessig appears to have conceded an argument on which cable may rely to resist regulation if the FCC wins the Brand X case in the Supreme Court. That case ultimately will decide whether the agency can classify cable modem service as a largely unregulated "information service" under the Communications Act. Lessig's concession, however, may not be enough to keep the FCC from enforcing net neutrality even if the Court hands the agency a victory.

Continue reading Another Lesson from a Mad River, Courtesy of Professor Lessig . . .

posted by Kyle Dixon @ 11:25 AM | Broadband, Cable, Communications, Net Neutrality, The FCC

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Media Deconsolidation, Part 5: "Clear Channel to Dismantle Media Empire"

"Clear Channel to Dismantle Media Empire." That's the headline from pg. B1 of today's Wall Street Journal. In the article, Sarah McBride reports that the media giant plans to spinoff its entertainment division "in the latest example of a media company deconstructing an empire built during the late 1990s."

As I've noted in previous posts, media deconsolidation is all the rage these days. The list of high-profile media divestitures and divorces continues to grow: AOL-Time Warner, Disney-Miramax, Cablevision, Viacom, Liberty Media, Sony, and on and on. They all have been pondering or carrying out major spin-offs or restructuring plans in recent months. As McBride reports in the Journal today, "Clear Channel is following a media-industry trend of deconsolidation that has picked up steam recently."

Continue reading Media Deconsolidation, Part 5: "Clear Channel to Dismantle Media Empire" . . .

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:41 AM | Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

DTV: The Art of the Deal

Patrick's post on the DTV "transition," occassions some musings on the outline of a deal to get this spectrum into use. For consumers, for the competitive process, for the growth of broadband wireless technologies, it is absolutely indispensable that this spectrum be put into better use than (unwatched) digital television transmissions.

It is a classic public choice problem: a concentrated group of beneficiaries with low use-value but high transfer-value (the broadcasters) holding out against a diffuse group of would-be winners --consumers and companies that will flourish with more broadband pipes. In this fight, the addition of the High Tech DTV coalition is welcome.

Continue reading DTV: The Art of the Deal . . .

posted by Ray Gifford @ 4:57 PM | Digital TV, Wireless

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Free the DTV Spectrum!

Former FCC Media Bureau Chief Ken Ferree once said of broadcasters and the spectrum they're supposed to release after the DTV transition that "they'd rather eat their children than give up this spectrum." Well, for the sake of all of those little tykes I hope Ferree's prediction doesn't come true, because the pressure is rising to free up that spectrum.

The High Tech DTV Coalition, launched today, is urging an early, hard deadline for release of the 700 MHz band spectrum. Executive Director Janice Obuchowski and her colleagues wrote leaders on Capitol Hill Tuesday arguing this point:

Certainty will allow the U.S. high-tech industry to secure the investment and develop the business plans required to deploy wireless broadband services in the 700 MHz band. This, in turn, will bring greater inter-modal competition among providers of multiple types of network technology, accelerating broadband build-out and lowering consumer prices.

Continue reading Free the DTV Spectrum! . . .

posted by Patrick Ross @ 3:23 PM | Digital TV, Wireless

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Whither the State Utility Commission?

Conservative legal heavyweights John Engler, C. Boyden Gray and Kenneth Starr weigh in on the future of state utility commissions at National Review Online today.

Their conclusion: "So, yes, there is role for vibrant federalism in the new telecom world. But it is a very different role than before. The old natural monopoly required economic oversight from guardians of the public interest. Today regulators need a keen eye for government-imposed barriers that can be swept away, so that technology and competition can bring consumers the ever greater wonders of the telecommunications revolution. Lowering regulatory barriers to investment and competition is not an abandonment of the states' role, but a leadership strategy that will benefit everyone."

The essay is addressed to folks on the Hill who will meet in committee today. While I may quibble with their easy use of phrases like "guardians of the public interest," these men have put out a challenge to lawmakers everywhere and it will be interesting to watch who takes it up. The House hearing can be streamed from this page.

posted by @ 10:10 AM | State Policy

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Monday, April 25, 2005

Will A Wireless Ratings Scheme Be Enough to Head Off Cellphone Censorship?

As I've mentioned in previous posts (here and here), the potential for cell phone content regulation is something worth monitoring. There have been some rumblings in Washington already about the need for the wireless industry to take steps to shield children from potentially objectionable material even before it hits the market. And you'd have to be a fool not to realize that at some point very soon, technological & media convergence is going to bring adult-oriented fare to mobile devices. The question is, once that happens, will regulatory convergence follow technological convergence? More specifically, will broadcast TV and radio "indecency" controls be imposed on wireless content in coming years?

Continue reading Will A Wireless Ratings Scheme Be Enough to Head Off Cellphone Censorship? . . .

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:44 AM | Free Speech, Wireless

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Friday, April 22, 2005

How Google and the Internet Are Challenging Traditional Media

There's a crowd of people out there who still think that nothing has changed in our modern media world. They think that the same old newspapers, television, and radio outlets that dominated the media marketplace 30 years ago are still the only media outlets of importance today.

For example, Farhad Manjoo of Salon claims that "it's hard to find anyone in the media world... who can furnish proof that new technologies are shaking the foundations beneath entrenched media giants. If anything, the Web and cable and satellite have expanded the reach of media conglomerates." Using similar conspiratorial rhetoric, FCC Commissioner Michael Copps argues that "those who believe the Internet alone will save us from this fate should realize that the dominating Internet news sources are controlled by the same media giants who control radio, TV, newspapers, and cable." And the ever-pessimistic Mark Cooper of the Consumers Federation of America has complained that "the Internet has not lived up to its hope or hype. It has become more of an extension of two dominant, 20th century communications media [television and telephony] than a revolutionary new 21st century technology."

To these critics, left me just respectfully say, get a grip! Wake up and take a whiff of reality because the media world has already changed in amazing ways and the Internet and cyberspace ARE shaking the foundations of traditional media.

Continue reading How Google and the Internet Are Challenging Traditional Media . . .

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:47 AM | Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Thursday, April 21, 2005

New PFF Analysis of S. 616, the "Indecent and Gratuitous and Excessively Violent Programming Control Act of 2005"

PFF has just released my new PFF paper on the rising threat of cable and satellite censorship. In the paper, I provide a section-by-section analysis of the leading pro-censorship measure, S. 616, the "Indecent and Gratuitous and Excessively Violent Programming Control Act of 2005." My analysis of the bill can be summarized as follows:

* Section 2's pervasiveness rationale has never been applied to newspapers and the Internet, and would be constitutionally suspect for cable and satellite.

* Sections 4, 7 and 8 would impose mandates on warning systems and filters deployed voluntarily by programmers. These efforts might best be grouped under the theme 'hanging the industry with its own rope.' Ratings systems are subjective, and government shouldn't have any say over them.

* Section 5's significant fines would carry the "clear as mud" indecency enforcement to cable and satellite, expanding the current confusion on what is appropriate.

* Section 6 would potentially abrogate contracts between national networks and their TV affiliates by forcing networks to expand veto power over programming, despite the fact that local affiliates already have significant influence.

* Section 10's proposal of a return of a "voluntary" code of conduct seems far from voluntary, with an implicit "or else" attached.

* Section 11 would exempt premium and pay-per-view channels, but what happens if S-616 forces popular content onto these networks and viewers follow? Would they then be regulated as well?

Please read the paper for more details. While the entire bill may not pass, given the atmosphere on the Hill and at the FCC today, portions of S. 616 could easily become law in coming months and years.


posted by Adam Thierer @ 11:14 AM | Free Speech

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

State Spyware Slippery Slope

As the debate over spyware continues to make waves in Congress, many states are also taking action to curb the incidence of the pernicious software. Yesterday, the Alaska State Senate passed a bill to put a ban on spyware. The Alaska bill, which appears to focus more on the adware aspects of spyware, including pop-up ads, adds a section to the state's current laws on unfair trade and business practices to include spyware. While this law is unlikely to have an adverse impact on the legitimate software market, it reintroduces the question of whether or not states should be legislating on this issue. The spyware issue is one that cannot be reasonably corrected at the federal level, due to its medium, the Internet, and thus its global nature, not to mention the difficulty in tracking spyware purveyors. These factors make it even less likely that state legislation will have a positive impact.

As stated previously in this space, federal legislation on spyware is a cause for alarm, based on the vague definition of spyware and implications such legislation could have on legitimate software and innovation, yet it may prove to be a necessary evil to thwart state legislation from running rampant and hurting interstate commerce as well as innovation in the software industry and the Internet as a whole. The task at hand then becomes choosing the appropriate legislation that will not only maximize positive benefits, but equally as important, limit the potential negative effects of regulation.

posted by Mike Pickford @ 11:10 AM | E-commerce

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Thursday, April 21, 2005

"Hill Ponders Regulating Convergence": A Note on the Proper Way to Solve "Level Playing Field" Concerns

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:57 AM | Cable, Communications, Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

More on Cellphone TV Regulation

posted by Adam Thierer @ 10:45 AM | Free Speech, Mass Media, Wireless

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Your Telephone Company Will Be Your Next Cable Company

posted by Adam Thierer @ 10:52 AM | Cable, Communications, Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Rising Suns

posted by Patrick Ross @ 10:49 AM | Sports

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Monday, April 18, 2005

Municipal Priorities

posted by Patrick Ross @ 11:16 AM | Municipal Ownership

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

The Internet Dragon

posted by @ 10:16 AM | Communications

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Do Regulators Read the Papers? The Blockbuster Antitrust Fiasco Revisited

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:43 AM | Antitrust & Competition Policy, Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Saturday, April 16, 2005

From Luxury Good to Disposable Item: The Amazing $29 DVD Player

posted by Adam Thierer @ 3:44 PM | Innovation, Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Friday, April 15, 2005

Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys

posted by Patrick Ross @ 5:18 PM | E-commerce

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Thursday, April 14, 2005

Media Convergence and the "Digital Zoo"

posted by Adam Thierer @ 11:06 PM | Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Murdoch: Embrace the Web

posted by Ray Gifford @ 8:39 PM | Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Robert George Blog -- Let the Pop Culture References Flow

posted by Ray Gifford @ 10:57 PM | General

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Standards Battles and Truces

posted by Patrick Ross @ 4:11 PM | Interoperability

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Reasons to Be Pessimistic about Universal Service Reform

posted by Ray Gifford @ 12:21 PM | Universal Service

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

More on Muni Ownership

posted by Patrick Ross @ 6:26 PM | Municipal Ownership

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

AG's Gone Wild! A Gathering Storm for Vonage?

posted by Ray Gifford @ 4:57 PM | VoIP

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Wi-Fi Isn't Free

posted by Ray Gifford @ 4:13 PM | Economics, Municipal Ownership

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

VoIP Blocking: The Case of Clearwire

posted by Ray Gifford @ 2:53 PM | Net Neutrality, VoIP

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Monday, April 11, 2005

The Pitfalls of Wi-Fi Municipalization

posted by Adam Thierer @ 10:52 PM | Municipal Ownership

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Taxes are Too Easy?

posted by @ 2:00 PM | State Policy

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Friday, April 8, 2005

C-Span and Indecency

posted by Ray Gifford @ 11:18 AM | Free Speech

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

E-Rate Fraud? I am shocked, shocked...

posted by Ray Gifford @ 10:58 AM | Universal Service

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Arkansas-VON-VoIP

posted by @ 9:47 AM | Broadband, State Policy, VoIP

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Thursday, April 7, 2005

A Little Telecom Reform May Go a Long Way in the Short Run

posted by Kyle Dixon @ 10:52 PM | Broadband, Capitol Hill, Communications, Innovation, Think Tanks

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Internet Jobs: Work from home! Make $$$!

posted by @ 4:20 PM | E-commerce

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Wednesday, April 6, 2005

Media Deconsolidation, Part 4: Is News Corp. Next to Downsize?

posted by Adam Thierer @ 1:50 PM | Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Interoperability and the iPod

posted by Patrick Ross @ 12:56 PM | Interoperability

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Tuesday, April 5, 2005

Blog Inflation: Sajak, Streisand, Shatner

posted by Adam Thierer @ 11:34 PM | Mass Media

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Baseball Optimism

posted by Ray Gifford @ 11:09 PM | Sports

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

What Counts As "Criminal" Speech?

posted by Adam Thierer @ 4:47 PM | Free Speech

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

If You Mandate It, They Will Come... Maybe

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:55 AM | Free Speech

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Monday, April 4, 2005

JPII on Communication

posted by Ray Gifford @ 3:11 PM | Communications

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

DeLong on Democracy

posted by Ray Gifford @ 3:08 PM | General

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Saturday, April 2, 2005

VoIP Tax Freedom Killed in Colorado

posted by Ray Gifford @ 6:46 PM | VoIP

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Friday, April 1, 2005

Jeff Pulver Urges Regulation by Shakedown

posted by Ray Gifford @ 12:25 PM | Antitrust & Competition Policy

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

Will Colorado Limit Taxation by Regulation?

posted by @ 11:40 AM | Broadband, State Policy, VoIP

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

A Good Great Debate

posted by Randolph May @ 10:34 AM | Communications

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment (0)

 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  FCC Makes Slew of Important Appointments
Another Lesson from a Mad River, Courtesy of Professor Lessig
Media Deconsolidation, Part 5: "Clear Channel to Dismantle Media Empire"
DTV: The Art of the Deal
Free the DTV Spectrum!
Whither the State Utility Commission?
Will A Wireless Ratings Scheme Be Enough to Head Off Cellphone Censorship?
How Google and the Internet Are Challenging Traditional Media
New PFF Analysis of S. 616, the "Indecent and Gratuitous and Excessively Violent Programming Control Act of 2005"
State Spyware Slippery Slope
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation