Yesterday, PFF President Ken Ferree was a witness at a star-studded House Telecommunications and Internet Subcommittee hearing on competition in sports programming. The impressive witness list also included NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, ESPN President George Bodenheimer, Time Warner President and CEO Glenn Britt, DIRECTV Executive VP Derek Chang and Mark Cooper from the Consumer Federation of America

In his testimony, Ken stated that programming carriage arrangements are best handled by negotiations, not government intervention. Ken was not alone in this assertion. No witness or Committee member seemed to be sympathetic to Commissioner Goodell's claim that distributors were discriminating against the NFL network in favor of their own sports programming.

An archived webcast (which includes Ken being chastised by Rep. Eshoo for an un-related paper we released recently) and written testimony can be found here.

Who would Patriot fans have to blame if their cable operator did not carry the final game of the New England team's undefeated regular season? Look no further than the NFL offices.

The NFL is the most financially successful league in the world. NFL franchises are worth, on average, about a billion dollars each, and five of them are worth quite a bit more than that. One might imagine that a league whose aggregate value exceeds the GDP of Iceland and Jordan combined would be content. One would be wrong.

No, the NFL is not making enough, apparently, merely filling stadiums (many of which were built with taxpayer subsidies), hawking team wares, and marketing TV rights to broadcast and cable networks. Now the NFL would like to wring a few more golden eggs from the goose by forcing non-fans to pay for televised games. Even those accustomed to the rich getting richer must find the inherent unfairness of the NFL’s power sweep offensive.

Last week, we hosted another successful CEO luncheon featuring Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens. Discussion at the event, now available as a webcast here, managed to cover topics ranging from the COPE bill to customer service. Below is, for me, some of the more memorable moments.

It never ceases to amaze me what some people think they have a "right" to in this country. The latest example comes from the field of cable television where "rights inflation" has been spiraling out of control for years. Consider some of the things that people have claimed that they have "a right" to in the context of cable and satellite television over the past 20 years:

* In the 1980s and 90s, a great number of people claimed they had a right to cheap cable TV programming. As a result, the Cable Act of 1992 was passed imposing price controls on basic cable.

* During that same period, it was also argued that certain broadcast channels should have a right to reserve capacity on cable networks to distribute their programming. Consequently, "must carry" mandates were formally enshrined into law requiring it.

* More recently, a number of people are saying they have a right to cable television on any terms they wish including on a channel-by-channel, or "a la carte" basis, instead of as part of pre-packaged bundle of programming. Despite the fact that it could destroy the wonderful diversity of programming we see on TV today, Big Government liberals promote a la carte regulation under the guise of "consumer choice" while Big Government conservatives hail it as a worthy effort to "clean up cable." The end result is an unholy alliance that seeks to create a new "right" to unbundled couch-potato fare.

* Not satisfied that the push for a la carte regulation will go far enough (or perhaps fearing that it will not be passed into law), the "let's-have-government-sanitize-cable TV" crowd has also pushed for a right to "family-friendly tiers" of programming. Cable operators started "voluntarily" adopting such tiers late last year.

* Importantly, the reason the industry "voluntarily" adopted those family-friendly tiers was because they were threatened by far more serious censorship proposals from those who feel that have the right not to be offended by anything they see on pay TV. Proposals to extend broadcast indecency speech standards to cable and satellite systems have been seriously debated in the halls of Congress this session.

Could rights inflation get any more absurd? You better believe it. This summer, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has gotten all worked up over consumers' "right" to sports programming!

Congressman Sensenbrenner's bill amending the Clayton Act to impose net neutrality obligations is a travesty in many respects. Importantly, it departs from the very important principle that antitrust law apply generally across the economy, and not be applied in special ways with special rules to specific industries. James Gattuso captures the Congressman's confused intellectual defense of his bill quite well.

More important than this, everyone knows that only baseball should receive special treatment under the antitrust laws. Polluting this hallowed principle special antitrust consideration is nearly unforgivable. As payback, someone should amend the bill to repeal the basebal exemption, but only as to Sensenbrenner's home-state Brewers.

Todd Zywicki gets it exactly right on the incoming and departing FTC commissioners, Bill Kovacic and Orson Swindle, respectively.

This should not be taken as an endorsement of Commissioner Swindle's unfortunate affection for the Atlanta Braves, a great team whose fans don't deserve their consistent, machine-like excellence and success. As for Zywicki's revelation that the rest of The FTC is full of Yankees fans, that has caused me to reconsider my assessment of it as a "model agency." My new position is the FTC should be abolished to end this embrace with an organization which so vigorously embraces and typifies "unfair competition," the very statutory charge the FTC is given to root out.

Given the not-infrequent references to sports on this blog, as an Arizonan I feel I must congratulate the Phoenix Suns on securing the best record in the NBA and home court throughout the playoffs. San Antonio gave them the top seed by losing last night, but Phoenix won anyway by crushing the otherwise red-hot Denver Nuggets (sorry, Ray and Adam). The Suns are the same age as me, and neither of us have ever won an NBA championship. I can't do anything about my shortcoming, but the Suns can address theirs by keeping it up in the playoffs, and exorcising the ghosts of close calls in 1976 and 1993. Beat L.A.! (Sorry, the Lakers aren't in the playoffs this year, but that is a habitual Suns fan chant. Also, my apologies for the title of this post -- I can't tell you how many "cute" Suns headlines I've seen over the years involving rising, falling, scorching, burning, and unfortunately, extinguishing.)

Lynne Kiesling's baseball optimism is touching, particularly when she can get excited by Rockies cast-off Jeromy Burnitz. The Cubs hopes for a perfect 162-0 season remain intact, and this season they have moved forward their normal cry: "Just wait until we get Prior and Wood back!" Since the last Cubs World Series was in 1908, since their founding my beloved Rockies have until 2090 to match the Cubs' current streak of futility -- but no one can say Rocks aren't trying!

Well, at week's end, it's back to the important stuff. Last weekend Coach K (you try to spell Kryzewski!) became the winningness coach in NCAA tournament history, passing Dean Smith, coach of that other school down Tobacco Road.

So, in their eighth straight Sweet 16 appearance, let's hope that the Devils can put together a couple more wins, maybe setting up another matchup with that other school down the road a piece.

Well, as I was saying on Friday, Tobacco Road, that somewhat imaginary but nevertheless somewhat real road between Raleigh and Winston-Salem, runs right through Duke Chapel, and it is the Devils' playground.

So on to Texas!