IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, August 9, 2006

AOL, Search Records and Privacy
(previous | next)

I've been reluctant to wade into the blog debate about AOL's released search records -- which may not have been as anonymized as they might have liked -- because I'm not familiar with the particulars. (I'm sure most of the other bloggers aren't either, but the journalist in me still likes to know the facts first before writing.) But Greg Piper in today's Washington Internet Daily has a well-researched piece on the possible legal ramifications of AOL's actions. I can't speak to the legal issues at hand here but I did share some broader thoughts with Greg on another question he asked, whether this "breach" gives ammunition to the Department of Justice in its efforts to obtain search records. After quoting several experts noting that this was being treated by AOL as a breach and thus not likely to bolster DoJ's efforts to get records for its defense of the Child Online Protection Act, Greg wrote this:

But Progress & Freedom Foundation Senior Fellow Patrick Ross told us AOL has given DoJ "some pretty serious ammunition" not only to force search engine compliance in the case, but also to press Congress for lengthy data retention mandates. "When one of the search entries is 'how to kill your wife,' I think all of us instinctively want authorities to find out who that person is," although the phrase might indicate research for a novel -- the situation with Ross's mother, a novelist, he said.

First, I covered COPA through the courts, and I believe the Administration should just leave it where it is and not try to revive it. I also understand why Google chose to resist surrendering search records, even anonymized ones, for that COPA effort. My point to Greg, however, was that this struggle isn't just one of laws and courts, it's one of public opinion. When I saw the "how to kill your wife" query, I gulped. There have been precedents of searches helping to convict criminals. As Declan McCullagh pointed out on CNET today:

A North Carolina man was found guilty of murder in November in part because he Googled the words "neck," "snap," "break" and "hold" before his wife was killed. But those search terms were found on Robert Petrick's computer, not obtained from Google directly.

Hard to argue with the police there. But should law enforcement be able to sweep up a bunch of random search engine queries and then go fishing for crimes?

As I told Greg, I think of my mother in this example. JoAnn Ross is the author of 95 (!) novels, the most recent of which have been suspense novels. If Alberto Gonzales were to look at her Google searches, or her Amazon.com purchases for that matter, they'd assume she had obsessions with: (1) Serial killers. (2) Arson. (3) Sniper rifles. Some of you may have heard of Paladin Press, the publisher famous for books such as how to make a bomb. Well, somewhere in my basement I have a book my mom handed down to me that's published by Writer's Digest Books, and it educates aspiring fiction writers on every type of poison. Does that mean I'm planning to poison Alexandria's water supply, like Luther Driggers?

Research could be the last refuge of a scoundrel. But we are innocent until proven guilty in this country. If there is reason to suspect criminal behavior and a search engine list is helpful, law enforcement already has means to obtain that information. But there is no reason to create needless alarm by having broad volumes of search information handed over, even if it is "anonymized," which we are learning is harder to do than we might think.

DISCLAIMER: I realized after writing this entry that the two journalists I quoted both have the distinction of holding jobs I used to hold. Let the reader be assured I did not single them out for this reason; there are many top-notch journalists on the tech policy scene today, enough that I'm glad I'm no longer competing with them. This was a coincidence, but a happy one.

posted by Patrick Ross @ 4:55 PM | Free Speech , Privacy

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly


Why not just use a simple search proxy that separates your identity from your search terms.

Been around for years and free!

heres a free on efor newbies.


Posted by: Dude at August 10, 2006 12:48 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation