IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Gross on Internet Governance
(previous | next)

The Internet governance debate isn't just a topic for diplomats, U.S. Ambassador David Gross told the conference here today. It's a critical cultural, economic and political issue, he said.

Gross is still positive about how this issue was dealt with at Phase 2 of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), at which proposals to "internationalize" Internet governance were defeated. Instead, a five-year charter was created for a discussion body to be convened -- but not run -- by the UN secretary general, which will allow any government or interested party to discuss a broad range of Internet issues. He saw this potential for dialogue as very important. But he saw more positives emerging from Tunis:

1. WSIS in Tunis explicitly endorsed the previous position taken in Geneva in 2003 that information flow should be free on the Internet. Gross said he's already used this unanimous adoption of close to 200 countries to call out countries not adhering to these principles. "It gives me a tool I didn't have before," but he said "I'm not naive" and he knows that censoring countries aren't going to stop "just because I ask them to do it."
2. It was "extraordinarily important" that Tunis endorsed the enabling of entrepreneurship on or with the Internet, permitting the continued economic growth stemming from the digital revolution.

Despite the good news, "vigilance is always important," Gross said. "This does not translate into 'This issue is no longer alive.'" Such issues always linger, he said, but now there is a forum for dialogue. The ITU in Geneva, however, will have their plenipotentiary this year, and they likely will ask if their scope incorporates this. This UN-affiliated entity has the right to ask this, he said. "Our view is that it already has a role to play with the Internet in network standards, etc., but should focus on core competencies such as spectrum management."

Asked what will come in the Internet governance debate in the next 5 to 10 years, Gross said he had a good reason to "dodge that question," because the Administration's approach is to make possible future progress but not to try to preordain that future. "We need to be flexible and go wherever technologies take us, to go wherever people's innovations take us." "I know this sounds unhelpful, but I really try to spend very little time wondering what the world is going to look like five years from now," he said, a strong contrast to when he was in the private sector.

posted by Patrick Ross @ 8:34 AM | Digital Europe 2006 , Free Speech , Internet , Internet Governance

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation