IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, December 2, 2005

Go Carte
(previous | next)

The WSJ reports that Cablevision has come out in favor of letting consumers purchase channels individually. Cablevision's Charles Dolan is quoted as saying the "opportunity to purchase programming on an a la carte basis would be in the best interests of consumers." And: "We do not believe in the long term that selling programming a la carte will be detrimental to either programmers or cable operators."

If Cablevision wants to offer a la carte on a voluntary basis, then more power to it. It would be useful to have a market test. What's stopping Cablevision from going ahead and doing it if it believes this would be in the "best interests of consumers"?

Maybe what Cablevision is really saying, though, is that, in the "best interests of consumers", it thinks the FCC should mandate a la carte. Or maybe Cablevision is saying that it feels a lot of heat from the FCC and it might as well get on board because, as the saying goes, "it has a lot of matters before the FCC." Or maybe it is merely saying--thinking--that if the FCC mandates a la carte for all multichannel video providers, for one reason or another, it will fare better than its competitors. So bring on the regulation!

I'm not sure what Cablevision is really saying. But if it wants to voluntarily offer a la carte because it believes consumers will respond positively and will be better off, then let's hope it quickly goes right ahead and puts its money where....you know what.

posted by Randolph May @ 2:58 PM |

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation