IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Monday, October 31, 2005

The Naked and the Dead
(previous | next)

Reportedly, the two Democratic FCC commissioners want to put the kibosh on the SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI mergers until the parties "voluntarily" agree to offer "naked DSL"--at which time the FCC would embody the "voluntary" commitment in an order approving the merger. This is an good example of what is wrong with the FCC's merger review process.

In a May 30 piece in the National Law Journal, I wrote about how the merger process "has been characterized by a whiff of regulatory extortion resulting from the imposition of merger conditions unrelated to compliance with existing statutory requirements or rules." I was just being polite when I said "whiff"!

In this instance, the question of whether a "naked DSL" offering should be a condition of merger approval--that is, a mandated unbundling of the telco's local service--is unreleated to any competitive concerns uniquely implicated by the merger. None of the parties on either side of the merger generally was offering naked DSL before they got together, so, without a condition, there would be no less naked DSL offered after merger approval.

And the Commission has thus far refused to require in any generic rule or policy an unbundled DSL offering. So obviously such a condition is not required to bring the merger applicants in compliance with any statutory or regulatory requirement. (As a matter of policy, in today's competitive environment, such mandatory unbundling should be dead because it stifles the incentive for new facilities investment and for innovation in new service applications. We want real facilities-based competition, not government-managed and regulated artificial competition.)

This long-standing abuse of the merger process to impose conditions unrelated to competitive concerns should be dead too. In our DACA project, the Regulatory Framework group proposed to do away with the FCC's authority to use the rubric of the indeterminate "public interest" standard to impose conditions unrelated to merger-specific competitive concerns. Although it is clear in this instance Chairman Martin and Commissioner Abernathy would prefer otherwise, with the Commission divided 2-2, the agency probably is about to serve up some more exhibits in the case of communications policy reform.

posted by Randolph May @ 11:00 AM |

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation