IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, March 8, 2005

Independent Pipes (or POPs Providers)
(previous | next)

I happily leave most of the blogging about the Grokster case to Jim DeLong and my IP colleagues. But the following quote in a story [subscription required] in today's Tech Daily by Drew Clark caught my eye:

"The telcos are getting more and more used to thinking of themselves as service providers and as pipes independent of content," said Alan Davidson, associate director of the Center for Democracy and Technology. Cable companies "think of themselves in closed relationships with content providers, even though the growth of their industry is coming from broadband."

It's a bit odd for Davidson to say that the telcos are getting more and more used to thinking of themselves as "pipes independent of content" when, as a matter of law, that is what they have been required to be for the last 75 years or so. In other words, they have been classified as common carriers required to transport content indiscriminately. And, it is said even today, by some, that the telcos have "a common carrier mentality" to refer to a way of thinking about themselves.

But my impression is that they are trying to shed not only the common carrier classification, with all that it implies, but the common carrier mentality. And, in today's competitive environment, it would be odd not to try, which means not wanting to be locked into a position of being deemed a POPs (plain 'ol pipes) provider. ["POPs Providers" is Copyrighted 2005-RJM].

posted by Randolph May @ 4:46 PM | Communications

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation