IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Universal Service: Broken But Fixable
(previous | next)

Just minutes ago, Joe Kraemer, Rich Levine, and I released a new book length study examining the current Universal Service system, focusing particularly on the high-cost and low-income subsidy programs. Read about it here.

The study contains a wealth of data demonstrating that consumers--speficially including those in rural and low-income households--are using non-wireline communications services, such as wireless and cable telephony, at rates that compare very favorably with the nation at large. In other words, competitive market forces now ensure a choice of service provider and lower prices for voice service independent of the universal service subsidy regime.

The universal service fund, particularly the high-cost part, is growing very rapidly, and the the USF fee tacked on to long distance calls now exceeds 10%. As with Social Security, some people just assume the Universal Service program is the "third rail" of communications policy--that it can't be reformed because it is "too difficult politically." But that can't be right, because delay will only exacerbate the problem, making real reform more difficult. And because so much traffic is moving outside the current US system so rapidly, there is a need to accomplish reform much sooner than with respect to Social Security. (Not to minimize the need for SS reform too!)

So, as we say in the Foreword: "It is our hope, if not our conceit, that armed with the information in this study, policymakers will recognize the need to act proactively to reform the burgeoning Universal Service regime before already-unleashed competitive forces bring it unceremoniously crashing down."

posted by Randolph May @ 12:14 PM | Communications

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation