IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Monday, October 4, 2004

A Glimpse Into The Post-Regulatory World
(previous | next)

The headline from a Oct. 1 TR Daily report states: "Line Sharing to end; Copps Wants FCC Action." The report says the line sharing mandate is supposed to end this past weekend, and Commissioner Copps fears for the future of broadband competition.

Putting aside questions whether regulatorily-mandated line-sharing constitutes competition or has any real postive impact on competition, the last sentence of the report caught my eye: "Line-sharing arrangements won't necessarily disappear immediately or completely. Covad Communications Group, Inc., for example, has negotiated line-sharing deals with SBC Communications, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc., and Qwest Communications International, Inc., that continue into 2005, and beyond in the case of Qwest."

Say that again, slowly! The end of government-mandated line-sharing won't mean the end of the sharing of lines because COVAD has negotiated a deal with the ILECs to continue using the ILECs' lines. I'm sure we will see a lot more of this type of commercial negotiation if we see the end of more regulatorily-mandated sharing requirements. Both those that have facilities and those that don't will have incentives to reach deals that make sense for both in the marketplace.

posted by Randolph May @ 3:39 PM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation