IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, December 23, 2003

Chinese Communists Embrace Property Rights
(previous | next)

Assuming freedom to range abroad and a bit afield at year's end, the news this morning that the Chinese Communist Party is proposing to amend China's constitution to provide that "citizens' lawful private assets are inviolable" strikes me as an encouraging development. In any accounting of a "naughty and nice" list (see below), I would put this, at least for now, on the "nice" side of the ledger.

As Madison reminded us in his famous October 1788 letter to Jefferson, written bills of rights, or what he called "these parchment barriers", ultimately may not be efficacious in protecting individual rights. But he went on to say that delineating such rights in the written constitution nevertheless is useful because the "political truths" declared would "become incorporated with the national sentiment." And, when he introduced the bill of rights in the first Congress, he suggested that if rights are incorporated into the constitution, they have a tendency "to impress some degree of respect for them, to establish the public opinion in their favor."

Free speech is guaranteed in the Chinese constitution as well, and we know that is one individual right that the "parchment barrier" has not protected. But the Communist Party's embrace as a constitutional matter of the inviolability of private property is at least a step in the right direction. Presumably one that has Marx and Lenin flinching in their graves. While modern communications technologies can be used for ill as well as good, my bet is that Chinese leaders (and others like them) will find it increasingly difficult to suppress individual expression and the free flow of information in the age of the digital revolution.

As we know from our own American experiment, the protection of private property, including intellectual property, and the protection of individual rights, are both necessary prerequisites to advancing the cause of progress and freedom. Let's hope the announcement from China is a sign of real change to come, and not just some more ink on a "parchment barrier".

posted by Randolph May @ 3:22 PM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation