IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog
  Institutions
     
  Tanks
     
  Blogs
     
  Mags
     

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

 
Wow: A Bipartisan, Legislative/Executive Call for Private Solutions to the Challenges of Internet Counterfeiting and Piracy
(previous | next)
 

For the past twenty years, my life and work in Washington D.C. have let me both observe and contribute to the operation of what is surely one of the best governments in human history. The resulting perspective was sometimes inspiring, often perplexing, and sometimes depressing. But while the daily foibles of representative democracy may sometimes cause even its most ardent advocates to contemplate the restoration of the Bourbon Monarchy, there are also those faith-restoring moments when principle unexpectedly trumps politics and common sense suddently prevails.

That happened this morning at a hearing held by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary entitled Oversight of the Office of the Intellectual Property Coordinator. Unless I am mistaken, this hearing produced something that I would not yet have predicted: a politically risky, bipartisan, Legislative/Executive-Branch call for private copyright owners, internet-access-service providers and payment processors to work together to devise private solutions to the challenges of curbing digital piracy and internet counterfeiting.

I thus extend my sincere, (and rather awed), congratulations to the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, and to the Democratic and Republican Members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. They all called for the private cooperation between rightsholders, access-providers and payment-processors that could restore the rule of law on the Internet and vastly expand the sort of lawful internet commerce in which Americans can engage while deterring the foreign racketeering enterprises that now play too large a role in unlawful internet commerce.

That is a remarkable result. It reflects not only the political courage required to speak truth to the self-righteously self-centered, but also the re-affirmation of a point that Congress rather quietly encoded in the DMCA in 1998: the best solutions to the challenges of digital piracy are likely to be those developed as a result of cooperation between private parties with diverse interests. See 17 U.S.C. sec. 512(i)(2).

I thus strongly encourage rightsholders, access-providers and payment processors to heed this clarion call to cooperate and devise solutions superior to those that would require copyright owners to enforce their federal civil rights by suing tens of thousands of the constituents of the Members of Congress and the President. These representatives of the People appear to be recognizing the simple truth: It is utterly absurd to imagine that we, the citizens of the most innovative nation on Earth, can devise no better means to enforce the exclusive rights of artists.

Nevertheless, if this call for solutions is not headed, then the Supreme Court should reconsider the wisdom of any judicial decisions that might be creating the appearance that private cooperation to preserve the rule of law is simply unnecessary. The Court moved narrowly to correct such a failure of common sense in Grokster. If it is forced to do something similar again, broader remedial measures may be warranted.

posted by Thomas Sydnor @ 2:16 PM | Copyright , IP , Internet , Mass Media , Trademark

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(4)

Comments

This idea -- of a joint project among copyright holders, internet providers, and consumers -- is really what's at the heart of the matter! And it's about time. But the idea HAS been floated for a while. Anyone who's kept up with ASCAP's Daily Brief, by Dean Kay, has seen the slogan out there for quite some time: "When creators and consumers are both happy, then everyone in the middle will have gotten digital distribution right." It's on Kay's blog about music business concerns, every day, and it's the idea behind the fact that people want music AND artists want their work to be available -- but in a way that makes it possible for them to earn a decent living.

Posted by: Leigh Harrison at June 25, 2010 7:01 PM

Good post, Leigh. Agreed.

Posted by: Mike Wendy at June 25, 2010 9:36 PM

Leigh: Well put: and I couldn't agree more. You are also right about both the ASCAP Daily Brief and Dean Kay's Deans List--they are invaluable.

Posted by: Tom Sydnor at June 30, 2010 8:19 AM

This is really a very good article, inspired a lot to me
http://monsterbeatsstudio.us

Posted by: Monster Beats Dre at May 4, 2012 10:57 PM

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation