IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Step Away from the IT
(previous | next)

Working in the IT industry, it's heretical to suggest, "Step away from the IT." But, sometimes, maybe we should.

I am not alone. Recently, the American Thinker ran a nice piece by Matt Patterson, entitled, Step Away from the Computer. In it he suggests:

...I do not advocate entirely forsaking the conveniences and necessities of the Digital Age. We need them for work and play, and I love my iPhone as much as the next person. But we need to learn how to turn it all off if we are to reclaim the noble soul that humanity has heretofore held but which is now rapidly slipping away. This technology, any technology, must be our servant, not our master. Prometheus brought fire to Man to assist us in life, not as a replacement for it.

Not as a replacement. Good advice.

I've been thinking about how much we use, or are used by, IT lately. It affects me physiologically - I have to wear "cheaters" to see my computer screen; turn up the headphones to hear my Nano; my hands ache at the end of a long day of typing, among other ill-effects.

Walking down K Street, I see people almost getting hit by cars, busses, engrossed in their iPhone or Blackberries. Workers tethered to iPods, going to their offices, listening to music or podcasts, numb to the day around them. Coffee drinkers at coffee houses, instead of bantering lively, typing away as they jack into the free Wi-Fi with their laptops.

A lot of important stuff must be happening.

I think back to a congressional staff briefing we held a decade ago. We were working to increase a tax break for small businesses to purchases computers - the theory being that IT, as opposed to office furniture, was a more productive asset to a company and the economy.

At the briefing, the Illinois Representative hosting the event talked about the importance of getting IT into offices, into our lives. But then he took a slight detour. He began lamenting that America manufactures, well, virtually nothing. And how, lacking that, we are losing our ability to lead the world. We haven't anything physical to sell - no tangible goods. And, in the "old world order" that meant power.

About 80% of our economy is services-based - wealth based on things we do instead of things we make. With the flattening of technology and knowledge, worldwide telecommunications networks / Internet, and cheap overseas labor, our role as the world's leading manufacturer got compromised decades ago. Real, global competition for that title mounts daily.

Today, intellectual property (IP) - i.e., ideas and expression - plays an ever growing role for U.S. leadership, underpinning, as Alan Greenspan has noted, about 1/3rd of our $15 trillion GDP. And while IP helps things like toasters, cars and computers work, you cannot touch it with your hands.

Touch. Hold. Nurture. All these actions you can't do with IP.

This is not to bemoan or belittle its importance to our economy and lives. Working to protect valuable IP from poachers is part of what I do for a living. Rather, for me it serves as an apt metaphor, or reminder, for our use of IT - which, sometimes makes me feel like it's much ado about...nothing.

Along these same lines, I had a particularly memorable conversation with a co-worker recently. At the end of the day, we both agreed, all of our work, letters, statements, bullet points, one-pagers, press releases, pictures - everything - they'll occupy the space of less than something incalculably small. Almost nothing.

Of course, life is what you make of it. Stepping away from computer every once in a while might help you make more of it.

posted by Mike Wendy @ 3:03 PM | Capitol Hill , Communications , Copyright , Generic Rant , Human Capital , IP

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(2)


The technology today has been used to its optimum level. The prime functions of the innovative developments on the technology is to answer all the analog functions that's been giving lot of problems to the society as a whole. To proceed with our daily life necessities with ease, technology has been upgraded. It upholds the innocent goals of men from ages and the ambitious dreams of the generations. Even today, technology has provided all the things that men need, but because of these dependence, technology suffer. It is not the answer when we say that we need to stop using technology but we must identify how can we responsibly use it for the better. Yes, it is conceded that technology has spoiled the humanity but even if these things happen, the society is the sole reason. We must not throw all the obligations to the technology and what is upholds, we must examine how we use it and not what technology can offer.

Posted by: Junk Your Clunker at October 1, 2010 2:40 AM

I like the fashion; I at first ordered the one--ended up exchanging for the other and enjoy Miu Miu Bags. I like the contrast of the chestnut suede and fleece-- plus they nonetheless go along with something. Ease and comfort & fashion!

Posted by: Miu Miu Bags at March 24, 2013 3:59 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation