IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog
  Institutions
     
  Tanks
     
  Blogs
     
  Mags
     

Saturday, March 6, 2010

 
Can These Numbers Be Right? FCC Paperwork Nightmare = 57 Million "Burden Hours"!
(previous | next)
 

by Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka

We're hoping that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has made some sort of mistake, because it's hard to believe its latest findings about the paperwork burden generated by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulatory activity. In late January, the GAO released a report on "Information Collection and Management at the Federal Communications Commission" (GAO-10-249), which examined information collection, management, and reporting practices at the FCC. The GAO noted that the FCC gathers information through 413 collection instruments, which include things like: (1) required company filings, such as the ownership of television stations; (2) applications for FCC licenses; (3) consumer complaints; (4) company financial and accounting performance; and (5) a variety of other issues, such as an annual survey of cable operators. (Note: This does not include filings and responses done pursuant to other FCC NOIs or NPRMs.)

Regardless, the FCC told the GAO that it receives nearly 385 million responses with an estimated 57 million burden hours associated with the 413 collection instruments. A "burden hour" is defined under the Paperwork Reduction Act as "the time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, or provide information to a federal agency." And the FCC is generating 57 million of 'em! Even though we are frequently critical of the agency, these numbers are still hard to fathom. Perhaps the GAO has made some sort of mistake here. But here's what really concerns us if they haven't made a mistake.

Assuming the GAO got these numbers right, just think of the deadweight economic loss associated with all this paperwork, and think of how it will grow in months and years to come! Can you imagine how much the numbers have likely grown so far this year, with the agency generating so many new public notices, notices of inquiry, requests for information, and more? And just think what the paperwork burden will look like once the National Broadband Plan and Net neutrality regulations kick in! Oh my... The agency has already promised lots more notices will flow out of the National Broadband Plan to implement various portions of it.

In terms of the deadweight loss, go back to the numbers Adam cited in his essay last week asking, "Will the FCC's Nat'l Broadband Plan Be "Full Employment for Lawyers"? As noted there, lawyers were about the only group that did fairly well thanks the FCC's over-zealous regulatory ways in the post-Telecom Act period. Greg Sidak of Georgetown University Law School found that the number of telecom lawyers-as measured by membership in the Federal Communications Bar Association-grew by a stunning 73% in the late 1990s. That was largely driven by a 37% hike in FCC spending and a tripling of the number of pages of regulations in the FCC Record in the post-Telecom Act period. Sidak argued, "If one assumes (very conservatively) that the average income of an American telecommunications lawyer is $100,000, then the current membership of the FCBA represents an annual expenditure on legal services of at least $340 million." And we all know that those lawyers were making a heck of lot more than just $100K (and billed even more), so Sidak's estimates were ultra-conservative: The deadweight loss of all this legal activity was much greater.

Indeed, a very conservative estimate of hourly rates for Washington communications lawyers would be $200/hour, but even at that rate, 57 million burden hours would equate to a total cost of $11.4 billion. In fact, when major Washington law firms use "blended rates" to bill out the time of senior partners, junior associates, and paralegals working in teams on things like regulatory filings, the figure is more like $350-400 (if not more)--which would equate to a deadweight cost of $20-23 billion every year. To put that staggering number in perspective, leaks about the National Broadband Plan indicate that the FCC might be planning on spending about that much to subsidize broadband deployment over a decade.

Or, to use another comparison, NASA's 2010 budget is a mere $18.69 billion. That's in the same ballpark as what, according to the GAO's man-hour estimates, the FCC's reporting requirements cost U.S. industry every year. As Wernher von Braun famously said about the Apollo program, which he led: "We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming."

So, "if we can put a man on the moon," as they say, why can't we do something about this paperwork burden so America's communications, media, and high-tech providers can focus on actually providing better, faster, and cheaper service to consumers?

posted by Adam Thierer @ 12:42 AM | The FCC

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(8)

Comments

Would love to perpetually get updated great blog ! . 962361

Posted by: test2 at March 17, 2013 5:37 PM

Glad to visiting your site. Great article and good website.

Posted by: Kawak Mebel Jepara at August 23, 2013 10:25 PM

Celui-ci a été maintenant Penciling are generally croissance des ventes signifiant près de 10 pour cent au lieu de 10 pour cent précédemment, tandis dont le bénéfice elemen

Posted by: ugg pas cher at November 25, 2013 5:44 AM

Celui-ci a été maintenant Penciling chicago croissance des ventes de près de 12 pour dime au lieu delaware 10 pour cent précédemment, tandis qui le bénéfice level

Posted by: bottes ugg at November 25, 2013 5:45 AM

Vos fonctionnaires municipaux disent Duncan a offert the meilleur prix plusieurs trois finalistes pour thelouboutin soldes contrat et any proposé d'utiliser le plus petit nombre de boîtes environnant les rémunération et plus lavish nombre de mètres Singlehead.

Posted by: louboutin soldes at March 19, 2014 4:35 AM

Aux municipales,Louis Vuitton Pas cher Freddy Vasseu se présentait en tant que membre du Parti pirate sur une liste de centre droit à Port-Lès-Valence. Résultat des élections, Louis Vuitton Pas cheril est élu au conseil municipal de la ville dès le premier tour. Le Parti pirate compte également 2 autres élus municipaux.

Posted by: Louis Vuitton Pas cher at June 16, 2014 5:21 AM

This is a most dangerious suggestion to people who are not familiar with poisonous berries 'If you are on a nature's trail and spot a berry in the wilderness, pluck the berry. Eat it. If it tastes like any of the berries you have eaten, then the berry is an edible fruit.' This method is dangerous and should NOT be suggested in a Web site. Turns out it is the pokeberry and is poisonous. So much for "eat blue or black berries but never white ones. " Heartslord [September 23, 2010]

Posted by: escarpin louboutin at July 10, 2014 12:28 PM

SALAIRES - La dernière proposition du Medef n'a vraiment pas du tout séduit son ancienne patronne Laurence Parisot. Son successeur, Pierre Gattaz, a ouvert ce mardi 15 avril la boîte de Pandore en se disant favorable à un salaire "transitoire" inférieur au Smic pour encourager l'embauche des jeunes. Une formule choc qui a entraîné un rejet immédiat du gouvernement et une réaction indignée des syndicats sur un sujet hautement sensible.

Posted by: bottes ugg femme pas cher at November 5, 2014 5:02 PM

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation