IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Apple's App Store, Porn & "Censorship"
(previous | next)

Oh my, here we go again with bogus accusations of "censorship" flying about a private company's efforts to self-regulate its own media platform. Yesterday over at Silicon Alley Insider, Nick Saint penned a piece on how, "Apple's War On Porn Is Just Getting Started." And then over at TechCrunch, Jason Kincaid wrote about "Why Apple's New Ban Against Sexy Apps Is Scary." That yielded a flurry of similarly-titled rants about Apple's supposedly totalitarian ways for taking away our new-found inalienable human right to unfettered porn and adult entertainment applications via our iPhones. To Mr. Saint, Mr. Kincaid, and the many others who apparently believe Apple is the reincarnation of Big Brother for self-regulating their own Apps Store, all I can say is: Grow up!

Here are a few things they need to consider:

  • What Apple decides to do with its application store, and what it chooses to provide in it, is Apple's own business--quite literally. Like a traditional bricks-and-mortar retailer, they can make policies about what types of content might be deemed too sensitive for the broad community of customers they serve. WalMart, for example, doesn't carry certain types of music in their stores. If customers don't like what those retailers are doing, there's always another place for them to take their business and find what they are looking for.

  • When it comes to the Apple controversy, we are generally talking about porn. Note to Mr. Saint and Mr. Kincaid and other whiners... there are plenty of other places to find porn on the Net! Seriously, have you looked?

  • A private company's decision to self-censor by not carrying something in their store is not even in the same universe as the sort of censorship we see government officials engage in, which blocks all content from all platforms. There is no escape from that sort of all-encompassing censorship.

  • Did I mention that there's plenty of porn on the Net? OK, just checking. (Really, there's lots.)

  • It's important to realize that if Apple did not take some steps to self-regulate it's App Store for the really nasty, envelop-pushing stuff, it would lead to enormous pressure from many parents and regulatory advocates for Congress to step in start regulating the Internet ecosystem. Better that Apple and other retailers choose to self-regulate than to have Congress and the nanny state start controlling online speech.

  • Finally, uh... why do you own an iPhone again? You don't have to, you know. I've been going round and round with Jonathan Zittrain and his disciples about this point over the past couple of years when they complain about Apple's heavy-handed control of the App Store or the iPhone itself. Sorry, but I have little sympathy in light of the fact that (a) Apple's App Store has over 100,000 apps in 20 different categories to choose from, so it's not like there's really any shortage of other stuff to choose from and, (b) there are many other non-Apple options on the market from which to choose if you don't like Apple's policies on porn apps. Get yourself a Android-based phone or something else. (Like Apple, Google bars the use of its apps store, the Android Market, for porn apps. But Google does allow users to install a separate apps store for adult apps, called MiKandi. MiKandi promises Blackberry and Windows Mobile marketplaces soon.)

  • (I can't resist...) Once more, all this whining is about porn! There's tons of it online! Go get your rocks off somewhere else besides the Apple Apps Store! Gheesh.

  • [P.S. Lest I need to prove my First Amendment credentials to repel the eventual attacks from those who might accuse me of being a prude, please read this and watch this.]

    posted by Adam Thierer @ 2:24 PM | Free Speech

    Share |

    Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(4)


    Pardon, but porn has nothing to do with it. Instead the issue is control. If I buy an IPhone, I should control what can and can't be installed on it, not Apple. Apple's insistence on being the only 'App Store' is an anti-competitive act against it's customers.

    That said, I think Apple has done a good job with their App Store. However if I decide to buy elsewhere I should be able to, and at the present I cannot. In fact there are several modifications I would like to make to my IPhone, and I am not allowed to make those modifications by Apple (specifically I want to load a Java VM on it).

    Posted by: The Mad Hatter at February 23, 2010 4:47 PM

    great blog

    Posted by: santa at March 19, 2012 5:55 AM

    Great post, check out the huge brazzers discount!

    Posted by: brazzers discount at April 13, 2013 10:54 PM

    This was a terrific read. It enchanted me, something which harddly
    ever happens to me these days, and I cannot wait to finnd out
    what comes next.

    Posted by: smokingsexfetish.blogspot.com at September 10, 2013 9:18 PM

    Post a Comment:

    Blog Main
    RSS Feed  
    Recent Posts
      EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
    New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
    Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
    iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
    "Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
    Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
    How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
    Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
    Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
    GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
    Archives by Month
      September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
      - (see all)
    Archives by Topic
      - A La Carte
    - Add category
    - Advertising & Marketing
    - Antitrust & Competition Policy
    - Appleplectics
    - Books & Book Reviews
    - Broadband
    - Cable
    - Campaign Finance Law
    - Capitalism
    - Capitol Hill
    - China
    - Commons
    - Communications
    - Copyright
    - Cutting the Video Cord
    - Cyber-Security
    - DACA
    - Digital Americas
    - Digital Europe
    - Digital Europe 2006
    - Digital TV
    - E-commerce
    - e-Government & Transparency
    - Economics
    - Education
    - Electricity
    - Energy
    - Events
    - Exaflood
    - Free Speech
    - Gambling
    - General
    - Generic Rant
    - Global Innovation
    - Googlephobia
    - Googlephobia
    - Human Capital
    - Innovation
    - Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
    - Internet
    - Internet Governance
    - Internet TV
    - Interoperability
    - IP
    - Local Franchising
    - Mass Media
    - Media Regulation
    - Monetary Policy
    - Municipal Ownership
    - Net Neutrality
    - Neutrality
    - Non-PFF Podcasts
    - Ongoing Series
    - Online Safety & Parental Controls
    - Open Source
    - PFF
    - PFF Podcasts
    - Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
    - Privacy
    - Privacy Solutions
    - Regulation
    - Search
    - Security
    - Software
    - Space
    - Spectrum
    - Sports
    - State Policy
    - Supreme Court
    - Taxes
    - The FCC
    - The FTC
    - The News Frontier
    - Think Tanks
    - Trade
    - Trademark
    - Universal Service
    - Video Games & Virtual Worlds
    - VoIP
    - What We're Reading
    - Wireless
    - Wireline
    Archives by Author
    PFF Blogosphere Archives
    We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

    The Progress & Freedom Foundation