IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Thursday, January 14, 2010

 
Robotic Prostitution, Parental Controls, Caprica & Sex in the Uncanny Valley
(previous | next)
 

If this robotic girlfriend--unveiled last weekend at the AVN Adult Entertainment Expo and costing $7-9k--actually goes mainstream, I'll bet it's only a matter of time before we see some state lawmaker somewhere propose to ban the toys. The FCC well, no doubt, follow suit, by demanding the incorporation of parental control tools into the devices so Junior doesn't have his way with Ms. Roxxxy (or her soon-to-be-released male counterpart, Rocky) while Mom and Dad are out at NASCAR the opera.

Laugh if you will, but if Moore's Law holds true, such robots will become smarter, cheaper, and probably sexier as microchips continue to plummet in price and meaningful artificial intelligence becomes marketplace reality. Move over, Roomba, Roxxxy has arrived--and she ain't no Rosie the Robot Maid from The Jetsons! Telegraph reports that there's a whole book about this:

In a 2007 book, "Love and Sex with Robots," British chess player and artificial intelligence expert David Levy argues that robots will become significant sexual partners for humans, answering needs that other people are unable or unwilling to satisfy.

But the most interesting part of the telegraph article is creator Douglas Hines's motivation:
Inspiration for the sex robot sprang from the September 11, 2001 attacks, he said, where a friend died and he vowed to store his personality forever.

This sounds an awful lot like the plot of Caprica, the new SyFi television series, a prequel set 58 years before the beginning of Battlestar Galactica, the cult phenomenon that even seduced hardened TV-refusenik like me.

The show launches January 22, 2010, but the prequel came out late last year birth of the Cylons, who began as clunky, metallic-scanned robots but eventually evolve into humanoids indistinguishable from humans--and also bent on wiping out the human race. While Battlestar was set in space, Caprica is largely set in cyberspace, and depicts nightmarish realm of violence, sadism, drug use, and utterly unbridled sexuality in which teenagers run wild and ultimately produce very, very scary robots whose artificial intelligence is actually born in cyberspace.

The Uncanny ValleySo my serious prediction for 2010 is that, if this prequel is half as popular its sequel, it will drive discussions about online child safety heights of hysteria. And yes, in the next, say, 10 years, I think these discussions will increasingly span the rapidly disappearing line between virtual reality and virtual people like Roxxxy. In both cases, the closer we get to verisimilitude, the more people are going to freak out--the "Uncanny Valley" first described by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. And, rest assured, the same people who have tried to shut down Craigslist's "Erotic services" category, will be sure to try to shut down "robotic prostitution." I haven't read it yet, but Adam Thierer reminds me that David Friedman discussed these issues in Chapter 20 ("All in Your Mind") of his 2008 book Future Imperfect: Technology and Freedom in an Uncertain World, including philosopher Robert Nozick's "experience machine" concept from his masterpiece Anarchy, State & Utopia. (Tyler Cowen also discusses this in his new book, Create Your Own Economy).

H.L. Mencken once defined "Puritanism" as "the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy." So perhaps "techno-Puritanism" could be defined as "the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be having fun with the content, service, screen, device, toy, or mechanical orifice of their choosing."

Don't like it? Don't use it! (And yes, as these tools to become prevalent and easily accessible by children, expect that their manufacturers will build parental controls into, but of course, the ultimate parental control for an expensive device is the power of the purse--and, if Mom and Dad really do want to keep a "playmate" in the closet but away from Junior--a good-ol' fashioned lock!)

posted by Berin Szoka @ 10:06 AM | Online Safety & Parental Controls , Video Games & Virtual Worlds

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Comments

My comment; we are making this to difficult it's just a doll and if the doll can do things that your partner is not willing to do then hip hip hurray! However if the doll is a replacement of your partner then we have a problem. My point is simply this if a doll can help in the union, marriage or wathever you are in , the go for it, what you do in your house behind your door is your business.

Posted by: Hesus Mourillon at August 29, 2010 7:34 PM

My comment; we are making this to difficult it's just a doll and if the doll can do things that your partner is not willing to do then hip hip hurray! However if the doll is a replacement of your partner then we have a problem. My point is simply this if a doll can help in the union, marriage or wathever you are in , the go for it, what you do in your house behind your door is your business.

Posted by: Hesus Mourillon at August 29, 2010 7:34 PM

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation