IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Crowdsourcing & Community Policing Are Better Than Government Censorship
(previous | next)

Over at Mashable, Ben Parr has a post ("Facebook Turns to the Crowd to Eradicate Offensive Content") expressing surprise that Facebook has a crowdsourcing / community policing solution to deal with objectionable content:

Did you know that Facebook has a crack team of employees whose mission is to deal with offensive content and user complaints? Their ranks number in the hundreds. But while most websites have people on staff to deal with porn and violence, none of them have 350 million users to manage... Now the world's largest social network found a way to deal with this shortage of manpower, though. Facebook has begun testing a new feature called the Facebook Community Council [currently invite-only]. According to a guest post on the Boing Boing blog by one of the council's members, its goal is to purge Facebook of nudity, drugs, violence, and spam.

The Facebook Community Council is actually a Facebook app and tool for evaluating content for various offenses... The app's tagging system allows council members to tag content with one of eight phrases: Spam, Acceptable, Not English, Skip, Nudity, Drugs, Attacking, and Violence. If enough council members tag a piece of content with the same tag, action is taken, often a takedown.

What Facebook is doing here is nothing all that new. Many other social networking sites or platforms such MySpace, Ning, and many others, do much the same. Video hosting sites like YouTube do as well. [See my summary of YouTube's efforts down below]**

No doubt, some will be quick to decry "private censorship" with moves by social networking sites, video hosting sites, and others to flag and remove objectionable content within their communities, but such critics need to understand that:

  1. Big communities require interest-balancing: Online communities like Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, etc., are broad-based communities with diverse interests and sensitives. Some forms of community policing are, therefore, necessary to achieve a reasonable balance among those interests. You are always free to "move" elsewhere if you don't like the standards set by a particular online community. The Internet is a big place; there's a community out there for every taste and interest!
  2. Private community policing beats public censorship: If larger, more popular online communities fail to take steps to establish private community standards, policymakers will suggest they should do it for them. Better that the various private online communities police themselves by "flagging & tagging" objectionable content than to have 5 unelected bureaucrats at the FCC (or FTC) regulating online speech for us. As pointed out above, you can always escape private online communities. By contrast, you cannot escape blanket, one-size-fits all federal censorship efforts.

** In late 2008, YouTube created a new "Abuse and Safety Center" to make it easier for users to report abusive behavior or inappropriate content. The site also makes it easy for users to find helpful information from various expert organizations who deal with troubling behavior.

For example, if a YouTube user reports "hateful content," they are directed to tips from the Anti-Defamation League. Similarly, information from the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is provided to those who report suicide concerns, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children provides information and links about sexual abuse of minors. YouTube also has strict "community guidelines" governing appropriate behavior on the site.

Finally, in May 2009, YouTube announced a new "Filter W*rds" program that lets users block profanity and racial slurs. According to the site: "Users can opt into this by clicking on 'Options' next to the Comments header and checking the 'Filter W*rds' box. Users can also choose to hide comments altogether by clicking on 'Hide Comments.'" Those user preferences will then be saved by the browser. According to YouTube, the site uses "a combination of feedback from users, proprietary technology, and a commonsense collection of words in English to decide what to filter." Incidentally, there's also a free Firefox extension called "YouTube Comment Snob" that that filters out undesirable comments from YouTube comment threads.

posted by Adam Thierer @ 2:11 PM | Free Speech

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(10)


well i think google buzz is going to be more efficant than all but why do you hate facebook so much i dont think so it is so badone

Posted by: stainless steel metal hoses at March 10, 2010 9:57 AM

Facebook on the google is very accurate blog because through this we keep touch in classmate and other groupmate

Posted by: newskycars at March 11, 2010 1:32 AM

I am not able to view your RSS feed URL.Can you please help me?

Posted by: Web Hosting Hyderabad at March 18, 2010 1:17 AM

clomid when should we have intercourse mg clomid australia

provera and clomid - pregnancy chances on clomid

Given that youve produced multiple drugs on a low dose of clomid I highly doubt theyd prescribe menopur for you, and given your age, again, I doubt thats going to be the first injectible a doc would choose. More likely they would start with something like Gonal F or Follistem both the same type of drug. Menopur has such a high multiple rate that they tend to save it for more difficult cases. To proceed please enable Javascript and Cookies in your browser.
nolvadex or clomid for pct clomid q&a

Posted by: clomidhowto at December 14, 2011 7:16 PM

I am a first time visitor an I can say that this post is really great. Very informative and I can really use this on my research on the topic titled "Inside the Internet World". Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Evaluate Free Online at February 15, 2013 11:58 AM

Outstanding blog, I have been viewing blogs for some time now and this one stand out because the writer of the contents has a unique style and the posts contains knowledge different from others. This definitely helps me on my research on internet marketing. I also bookmarked it.

Posted by: Evaluate Free Online at February 15, 2013 12:00 PM

good post,I am glad to visit your website.. This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality and it is very useful one and gives in depth information.Thanks

Posted by: Evaluate Free Online at February 15, 2013 12:01 PM

Genuinely talking, this is actually the period associated with Michael kors purses exactly where a large number of individuals are purchasing all of them in order to satisfy their own contemporary modern desires and needs however you like. They're really conventional, emblematic as well as flexible purses. Most of all, your personal Michael kors purses tend to be produced with a extremely distinctive, inexpensive as well as long lasting share. As a result of top quality production, your personal Michael kors purses might consequently appear really fascinating purses. Presently these people can be found in numerous expert purses stores on the internet through enabling you to very easily purchase your personal Michael kors purses on the internet. They're really durable purses by which you can very easily reserve lots of add-ons for example attires, jewelry, makeup, beauty items, belts, notebook computers, shades, and many more. That's the reason on the internet Michael kors purses business enables you to obtainable reduced Michael kors purses.

Posted by: michael kors handbags on sale at March 12, 2013 11:58 PM

Remarkable! Its truly awesome piece of writing, I have
got much clear idea regarding from this piece of writing.

Posted by: Anh at April 17, 2013 2:45 AM

I'm still learning from you, but I'm improving myself. I definitely liked reading everything that is written on your site.Keep the posts coming. I enjoyed it!

Posted by: Howell at April 23, 2013 7:45 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation