IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, December 11, 2009

Cheer Up, Canada: Thomas the Tank Engine Is Not a Conservative
(previous | next)

A philosopher of my misspent youth, one Mr. William Idol, opined that it is best to be British because you can get away with more than the citizens of other English-speaking nations. While I cannot disclose the best proofs of Mr. Idol's theorem, (naming names is rude), its second-best proof is surely the always-interesting and often-funny British technology-news website The Register. An example: Only by actually writing with a British accent can you get away with calling those who brainlessly but militantly oppose the enforcement of copyrights "freetards."

I thus note that today, The Register bravely reported on the shocking results of some media research conducted by some Canadian sociologists:

Research by the University of Alberta has chillingly revealed that kids' TV show Thomas and Friends may be engendering a "conservative political ideology" in future generations--a repressive mindset which "punishes individual initiative, opposes critique and change, and relegates females to supportive roles."

Shauna Wilton and friends from the uni's Department of Social Sciences analyzed 23 episodes of the programme, and noted that while it "conveys a number of positive political values...", there is a dark side to Thomas the Tank Engine.

Were Professor Wilton's work A Very Useful Engine: The Politics of Thomas and Friends correct, then it would represent a frightening discovery. After all, we parents all know that children's television is already awash in "conservative political ideology." The Barry-Goldwater-like messages of Sesame Street and Barney the Dinosaur are inescapable. Sociologists also warn that it is no coincidence that the baby-faced sun that shines upon the Teletubbies looks a lot like Rush Limbaugh.

Fortunately, in this case, the learned sociologists from the University of Alberta are dead wrong. If leftist ideologies fail, it will not be because Thomas the Tank Engine brainwashed Canadian tots into adopting a "conservative political ideology."

I know this because I am the father of an almost-5-year-old boy named "Thomas" who, (and this will come as a shock), instinctively and without parental prompting adores all forms of large, powerful machinery--trucks, trains, cars, cranes, you name it.

Naturally, my son thus loves Thomas the Tank Engine. Indeed, he loves Thomas so much that our attempted educational trip to the site of the British colony at Jamestown, Virginia, became a teary debacle when my son discovered that we were not actually visiting a town where we could meet James, the red steam engine who can be haughty towards the smaller and blue Thomas.

In short, I know Thomas and the other inhabitants of the Island of Sodor well. Really well. Consequently, I just scoffed when The Register reported that the Canadian sociologists who allegedly discovered Thomas' conservative ideology did so by reviewing a scant 23 episodes of his show.

You call that "expertise"? Ha! Have a seat, silly sociologists, and learn the cold, hard truth from a parent who has watched more than a mere 23 episodes of Thomas and Friends.

Thomas the Tank Engine is not a capitalist stooge. To the contrary, socialism is alive and well--at least on the Island of Sodor. Sodor's railroads are all nationalized. That is why Sir Topham Hatt, (who was called "The Fat Director" during the dark days of capitalism), is called "The Fat Controller." Thomas the Tank Engine is a thus a loyal and subservient employee of the State who wants only to be Really Useful.

So the sociologists can relax: Thomas is a perfectly healthy role model for the preschoolers of Canada.

Indeed, given that these learned professors got the facts of Thomas and Friends backwards, one might wonder whether I am worried that a cheeky socialist tank engine might be affecting my son with his happy tales of life in a socialized economy. After all. Professor Wilton warns:

We tend to think of children's TV shows as neutral and safe, but they still carry messages. Eventually these children will atain full political citizenship, and the opinions and outlook they develop now, partially influenced by shows like Thomas and Friends, are part of that process.
But I am not worried about that. I have already been through this with my 7-year-old daughter. Consequently, my worries about Thomas the Tank Engine have nothing to do with politics.

Rather, I worry that a day will come sooner than I think when I will have forgotten about that blue tank engine as I (again) assemble a donation bag by (again) cleaning out the bin of toys-that-no-one-plays-with-anymore. And there, at the bottom, I will find my son's now-favorite Thomas the Tank Engine, still smiling his slightly battered smile.

Only then will I realize--too late--that I miss that little tank engine almost half as much as I miss my own little almost-5-year-old Thomas. Sociologists who could discover a truth like that might be of some use to real parents.

posted by Thomas Sydnor @ 12:11 AM | Capitalism , Generic Rant , Media Regulation , Security

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(7)


Very well put. I too am at the point where I am enjoying my son's enjoyment of Thomas, so much so that we are planning our next outing on the watercress line for a ride on Thomas and his socialist friends. But as you so adequately put it the end of those days looms closer every day.

Happy Hols

Matt Davis

Posted by: Matt Davis at December 17, 2009 10:57 AM

Thomas is certainly NOT a show about traditional capitalism. It's about socialism, plain and simple. Being a "useful worker" and "cooperating" is not what free markets and liberty are about. So yes, Canada, keep on being useful workers and cooperating and you'll soon be forced to abide by Sharia law.

Posted by: karen at July 27, 2010 8:22 PM

Thomas & Friends Wooden Railway toys are guaranteed to last for life, but the same cannot be said of the messages that come from the TV show.

Posted by: Friend of Thomas Toy Train at July 31, 2010 6:14 PM

Matt Davis, I will ignore your comment about sharia law because it is utterly offensive and repulsive that you would even think that a liberalized, socialist society would associate with religious extremism. Religious extremism is more prevalent in the right wing.

Posted by: Mike Gutman at June 14, 2012 7:23 PM

This is disturbing. I am, for lack of a better word, disturbed by the persistent socialist undertones that run through the show- "be REALLY, REALLY useful! ...or join the scrap heap."
Conservatives are repressive? Consider that in 2010 Francios Houle threatened Ann Coulter with a lawsuit in an attempt to prevent her from speaking at the University of Ottawa. He said, “Canadian law puts reasonable limits on the freedom of expression.”
He didn't even want to allow her to speak. Why?
I believe in the freedom of speech and peaceful assembly, even for people who totally disagree with me. That is freedom. Let me live my life the way I want. Don't tax my working class family to death. Don't punish smart, hard-working people who make a lot of money. I only deserve what I earn. No one owes me anything but my own freedom.

Posted by: Sierra at September 13, 2012 1:30 PM

480?480:true;" onclick="resizeImg(this,480)" class="size-full wp-image-43551" title="NewNorrisHouse" src="http://www.earthtechling.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/NewNorrisHouse.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="310" />

Posted by: Ray Ban Jackie Ohh at July 23, 2014 12:22 PM

En France, le Parti pirate présentera des listes dans six des huit vanessa bruno pas chercirconscriptions, avec pas moins de 30 candidats en Île-de-France et pour les Français à l'étranger. En plus de ça, le mouvement sera présent dans une quinzaine d'autres pays européens.

Posted by: vanessa bruno pas cher at February 18, 2015 5:25 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation