IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Thursday, March 26, 2009

An Interesting P2P Usage Study from ISU's Digital Citizen Project
(previous | next)

This summer, in the FCC's Comcast Order, three Commissioners made a claim that immediately rang false:

"Although once relegated to serving, in most cases, the savviest Internet users with unsavory or even unlawful purposes, BitTorrent and other peer-to-peer technologies, such as Gnutella, have entered the mainstream."

This claim was not supported by the "supporting" third-hand data cited. All file-sharing programs have some lawful uses, and some closed or filtered programs are certainly used mostly for lawful purposes, (when they are used), but I am aware of no data supporting a claim that the "mainstream" uses of, for example, the Gnutella protocol are now savory and lawful. For example, in Grokster, evidence showed that 97% of the files actually selected for downloading by program users were or were highly likely to be, infringing.

Fortunately, Illinois State University's Digital Citizen Project has been gathering empirical data about how many file-sharing programs are actually used. When I checked back in at its website, I noted that the Project has released another recent study, Dimensions of P2P and digital piracy in a university campus, by Alexandre M. Mateus and Jon M Peha ("Dimensions").

Dimensions reports "results from the first large-scale quantitative assessment of online media transfers based on actual observation of P2P exchanges on a college campus." The authors also report that their data on infringing uses "are... lower bounds on the actual quantities that we want to assess." Dimensions notes two reasons for this conclusion.

First, the study relied mostly upon an Audible Magic appliance to identify infringing file-sharing. For obvious reasons, the database against which it checks files consists mostly of recent, high-value content like popular music, movies, and TV shows. Older or less popular protected works of these types are less likely to be included, and many types of works, including graphic arts, photographs, software and games--and adult movies--are not included at all. The authors thus used other techniques, like examining file metadata, to assess whether non-flagged content was noninfringing or "adult."

Second, the monitoring program was widely and extensively publicized and debated. "It is therefore possible that this public discussion deterred some people from engaging in illegal transfers, thereby affecting our results."

Nevertheless, infringing uses of the monitored protocols were found to be pervasive. Here are some particularly interesting findings:

  • "[W]e found no evidence that large numbers of students use P2P for these legal purposes and not to transfer copyrighted material." (p.1)
  • "Most users are intensive users of P2P to transfer copyrighted material." (p.21)
  • "Some might suggest that there are many people who use P2P for the legal transfer of software, such as Linux, or for the transfer of adult material (which may or may not be copyrighted), but do not engage in the illegal transfer of copyrighted material. However, we found no evidence of this among college students." (p.29)
  • "[A]s for the legal transfer of software, the percentage of P2P users found transferring Linux out of those that do not transfer copyrighted media is not statistically different from zero." (p. 29).

In short, analysis of actual data confirms that file-sharing is still mostly piracy and "porn," (used in its loose sense as an unflattering synonym for "adult" movies and images). The admirable efforts of those trying to develop lawful uses of these technologies should not obscure reality: the "mainstream" uses of too many file-sharing applications are still highly unattractive--the unlawful and the unsavory still dominate, spiced, sometimes, with the sort of inadvertent file-sharing that "shared" over 150,000 New Yorker's tax returns with identity thieves and the plans for President Obama's new Presidential helicopter with Iran.

posted by Thomas Sydnor @ 5:19 PM | IP , Internet , Privacy , The FCC

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation