IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog
  Institutions
     
  Tanks
     
  Blogs
     
  Mags
     

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

 
Tim Wu's "Mother-May-I" World of Net Neutrality Regulation
(previous | next)
 

Tim Wu has an absurd piece in today's New York Times comparing America's broadband marketplace to OPEC. This really is quite outrageous, beginning with the fact that OPEC is a GOVERNMENT-RUN cartel. Wu also had a comment in the Washington Post today saying that he didn't think broadband metering was an outrage. Well, that's nice. I'm happy that we have Tim's permission to experiment with new business models for financing broadband networks going forward!

This is indicative of what we can expect in the future once Net neutrality laws get on the books: A world of incessant "Mother may I?" permission-based forms of preemptive Internet regulation. Tim and his radical band of regulatory advocates over at Free Press will incessantly petition the FCC to review each and every business model decision and encourage the unelected bureaucrats at the agency to manage the Internet to their heart's content.

And what does Tim offer for an alternative vision of the way the world should work since he doesn't believe private markets can handle the job? Well, it's back to the Big Government drawing board for more tax-spend-and-subsidize solutions! "Amsterdam and some cities in Utah have deployed their own fiber to carry bandwidth as a public utility," he says. Yeah, that's the promised land. After all, it's working out soooooo well at the municipal level. Please.

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:50 AM | Internet , Municipal Ownership , Net Neutrality

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)

Comments

You'd probably find it easier to expand your readership if your comments weren't so childish and inane. Tip: name-calling and yelling "nanny-nanny-poo-poo" at someone you disagree with isn't a busines model, it's a personality problem.

Posted by: James Davidson at July 30, 2008 11:05 AM

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  Great PBS News Hour Debate @ Impact of the Net & Technology
Free Press Calls on Feds to Halt TV Innovation
Excited to Be Heading to CES This Week!
Radio Innovation & Audio Competition in the 2000s
How Did We Live Without These Technologies 10 Years Ago!
Are Consumers Mindless Sheep?
William Patry's "Moral Panic" about MPAA, Dan Glickman and ACTA
What an Amazing Decade (of Technological Progress)!
2010: The Year of "Everything Neutrality"
U.S. Legislators CANNOT Trust Claims that 37% of the DMCA Takedown Notices That Google Receives Fail to State "Valid Copyright Claims."
Archives by Month
  January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Podcasts
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation