IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Saturday, May 3, 2008

What's pointless about fun?
(previous | next)

Over at "The Social," a CNet blog about social networking and social life, Caroline McCarthy discusses a new study that she says "reveals [a] shocking truth: Most Facebook apps are silly, pointless."

A new study from number-crunching firm Flowing Data did some eye-opening work recently, dividing 23,160 Facebook applications into 22 categories. A whopping 9,601 of them fall into Facebook's "just for fun" category, followed by "gaming" and "sports" with over 2,000 each. In other words, the majority of Facebook applications are goofy time-wasters.

She calls this "an unsettling piece of news that I don't think any of us saw coming" and says "The world of social networking may never be the same."

Sorry, but I fail to see why this is either "unsettling" or that social networking "will never be the same." The fact that many people would develop or use applications "just for fun" is hardly surprising, nor do I find it as lamentable as McCarthy or others who have been commenting on this new report.

A great number of OFFline applications in our homes or offices have been developed "just for fun" as well. Moreover, just because a lot of people are developing / using applications that are "just for fun" on social networking sites, that certainly doesn't mean that there aren't thousands of other great tools and applications out there that people are using. That chart makes that clear.

In fact, the concern raised here reminds me of debates about what's on cable television these days. Some people just can't get over the facts that large numbers of people watch a handful of channels that contain what they might regard as "mindless" entertainment or activities (think MTV, ESPN) instead of supposedly culturally-enriching fare. It's an old story, actually. Culture critics have always bemoaned the fact that people would rather be entertained than informed. But that's life, and I don't think there's anything wrong with it. Most people are getting more information and culturally-enriching affair today than ever before, but they will still consume more "just-for-fun" content and services in the aggregate. Why? Because it makes them happy. What's wrong with that?

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:55 AM | Generic Rant

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly


in fact, it would be really interesting to know whether these are developed or installed applications.

Say there are 9609 "Just for fun" apps installed, each one, by a couple of users. And say that there are less than 2000 "Education" apps but each one is installed by 1000 users.

I don't think it is this way, but anyway conclusions would be quite different.

Actually, some (how many?) of "Just for fun" apps are developed as advertising devices. Not that different from TV, indeed.

Posted by: ismael at May 3, 2008 10:51 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation