IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

UK's "Unique Learner Number"
(previous | next)

Hmmm.. This sounds like trouble waiting to happen for kids in the UK. According to News.com:

British students aged 14 to 19 will have their school records permanently placed on an electronic database accessible to prospective employers. The project, called Managing Information Across Partners (MIAP), will launch in September. The record will include personal details and exam results and will remain with the pupil for life.
The system will be based on a Unique Learner Number. "The Unique Learner Number, necessary to acquire a learner record for the diploma is a unique identifier that can be used by a learner for life," MIAP said on its Web site. "It is a national number that is validated and is therefore deemed to be unique." The aim is to expand the system to include other information and to allow details already available but scattered across many databases to be brought together, it said." The pupil would have control over the record and would be able to restrict the information shared.

Maybe. Or maybe not. As the story goes on to point out:

The ability of official [UK] bodies to keep personal data secure has been questioned by a spate of recent scandals. In December, nine NHS trusts lost 168,000 patient records. A month before, the details of 25 million child benefit claimants went missing. And information on 3 million learner drivers disappeared during that time. Government plans for national identity cards have also been criticized for their expense and so-called Big Brother infringement.

As I pointed out last year in my big PFF study on online age verification, school records provide a gold mine of information about children. In fact, school records are among the only reliable records that are created about kids. But, at least in the United States, we jealously guard access to those records and take extra precautions to protect the privacy of minors and their personal information from bad guys.

After all, if a child's personal information falls into the wrong hands, it could haunt them for life. Kids have clean records that make a coveted prize for identity thieves. Moreover, some cyber-predators would love to have access to more info about kids if they could get their hands on it. That would make it easier for them to find troubled kids who might be ripe for exploitation. This is why we have laws like the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 here in the U.S., which makes it illegal to release school records without written permission from parents. And there are a variety of other state laws the tightly restrict access to school records here in the U.S.

The goal of this UK plan, by contrast, seems to be to make it much easier to collect and move school records about kids around online. Probably not a good idea.

posted by Adam Thierer @ 3:14 PM | Online Safety & Parental Controls , Privacy

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation