IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, February 29, 2008

Stanford / Google "Legal Futures Summit"
(previous | next)

Wow, look at the lineup for this Google and Stanford Law School event that I am speaking at next week as part of a "Legal Futures Summit," which is billed as "a conversation between some of the world's leading thinkers about the future of privacy, intellectual property, competition, innovation, globalization, and other areas of the law undergoing rapid change due to technological advancement."

I have no idea what I'll be saying at this event, but I'm really looking forward to just interacting with this impressive group of intellectual powerhouses. [Apparently the second day of the event--next Saturday--is open to the public. So Silicon Valley locals might want to come and hear the fun.] Anyway, here's the lineup...

Conference chairs:

* Larry Kramer / Dean, Stanford Law School
* Lawrence Lessig / Professor of Law, Stanford Law School; Founder and Co-Director, Center for Internet and Society
* Kent Walker / General Counsel, Google

Conference Speakers:

* Jamie Boyle / Professor of Law, Duke Law School; Co-Founder, Center for the Study of the Public Domain
* Tim Bresnahan / Landau Professor in Technology & the Economy, Stanford University
* Michael Callahan / Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Yahoo!
* Tom Campbell / Dean, U.C. Berkeley Business School
* Paul Cappuccio / General Counsel, Time Warner
* Dan Cooperman / General Counsel, Apple; former General Counsel, Oracle
* David Drummond / Senior Vice President, Google
* Lauren Gelman / Executive Director, Center for Internet and Society and Lecturer in Law, Stanford Law School
* Jamie Gorelick / Partner, WilmerHale; former U.S. Deputy Attorney General
* Jennifer Granick / Civil Liberties Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation
* Joi Ito / Chair, Creative Commons; Founder & CEO, Neoteny
* Michael Jacobson / General Counsel, eBay
* Jeff Jonas / Distinguished Engineer and Chief Scientist, IBM Entity Analytics
* Andrew Keen / Author, Cult of the Amateur
* Daphne Keller / Senior Product Counsel, Google
* Chris Kelly / Chief Privacy Officer, Facebook
* Orin Kerr / Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
* Alex Kozinski / Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
* Mark Lemley / Professor of Law, Stanford Law School
* Pierre Leval / Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
* Eben Moglen / Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Founding Director, Software Freedom Law Center
* Deirdre Mulligan / Professor of Law, U.C. Berkeley Law School; Director, Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic
* Charles Nesson / Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
* Beth Noveck / Professor of Law, New York Law School; Director, Institute for Information Law and Policy
* David Post / Professor of Law, Temple University Law School; Adjunct Scholar, Cato Institute
* Xiao Qiang / Lecturer, U.C. Berkeley School of Journalism
* Marty Roberts / General Counsel, Linden Labs
* Jay Rosen / Professor of Journalism, NYU; Founder, NewAssignment.net
* Jeffrey Rosen / Professor of Law, GWU; Legal Affairs Editor, The New Republic
* Tom Rubin / Associate General Counsel, Microsoft
* Paul Schwartz / Professor of Law, U.C. Berkeley Law School
* Gigi Sohn / President & Co-Founder, Public Knowledge
* Cass Sunstein / Professor of Jurisprudence, University of Chicago Law School
* Adam Thierer / Senior Fellow, Progress & Freedom Foundation; Director, Center for Digital Media Freedom
* Barbara van Schewick / Professor of Law, Stanford Law School; Co-Director, Center for Internet and Society
* Hal Varian / Chief Economist, Google
* Stephen Venuto / Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
* Eugene Volokh / Professor of Law, UCLA Law School
* Fred von Lohmann / Senior Staff Attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation
* Kevin Werbach / Professor of Legal Studies & Ethics, Wharton School of Business; former Counsel for New Technology Policy, Federal Communications Commission
* Tim Wu / Professor of Law, Columbia Law School
* Jonathan Zittrain / Chair, Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University; Visiting Professor, Harvard Law School

posted by Adam Thierer @ 2:10 PM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly


Respected Sir,

You are requested to Read & Think for the best future by right Education in children / youth or everywhere. How bad elements work & how to save own self to others. The best education may be adopted everywhere & circulated at all the places.

Page no.24 (18th line) To-day the Education given to the females is not good. We should give Progressive and Truth Education and it is not only from the books.

Page no 68 (12th line) If we think & ask them (females), they have nine lives in India like Cats and Boys are dying like houseflies.
Above written in Hindi book------Bhartiya Nari
Written by Swami Vivekananda

Page no. 64 (last five lines) No proofs are required for those females, who are thirsty for blood of males.
Above written in Hindi book-----------------Vedanta In Practical Life
Written by Swami Vivekananda

We can Read &Think to save children by right Education & a automatic system by simple & equality basis Law as in INDIA some wife are very kind to their Criminal Guru & serve human beings & slaughtered in remote areas . You may call me anytime for 10/15 minutes.
Kishan Jalan Mobile : 98318-22701
Thanking You, 12/2,Shobharam Baisakh street
Kolkota-700 007

Criminals who are doing antisocial work and Criminal Guru give antisocial education. You must have seen or you may think that people as soon as gets up in the morning and they think for their work like (i) Agricultural farmers think for their work or how to get more products / good products for everybody (ii) Scientists think for their achievements or how to get new / good / improved / modern facilities to the public (iii) Teachers think for the students / classes (education) (iv) Businessman think for sale / purchase (earnings) (v) Professionals think for their work like others also. This way mostly / always children / innocents have suffered in
Satyug,Dwapar,Treta,Kalyug…………& Think to Reach………………… “ONLY SATYUG / no midlife deaths“…………..…....to save the ..............CHILDREN / INNOCENTS
A good work can be done regularly by even asking one rupee by way of Donation / Contribution to save people from a Criminal Wife / Women.

Posted by: kishan at March 4, 2008 6:07 AM

Antisocial Guru gives wrong education to females to break the relations and any relations break there is involvement of antisocial Guru & these Gurus’s guru are Criminals only and anti to everybody through antisocial education as well as development also.

Now, we should think for right Education & a simple / equality basis law as these Guru gives threatening for the family, so, we should not tell their working to save children / people. When, we have the equality basis law the crime / deaths will be minimize / stop and their wrong education will not work.

In INDIA two types of antisocial females (who are thirsty for blood of males) are working (1) Female Guru , Muslims knows & they give male blood from male organ / penis in childhood only (2) Some wife who are thirsty for blood of males. Both things cannot be done in common places hence happenings in remote areas.

As I mentioned truth in above Para is known by Indian Saints and that is why they don’t marry. These Saints get this education by thinking truth on this world & some of them will help you to reach at above stage. After all only true Education & automatic system by simple law on equality basis can save children / husbands / wife. As soon as people get married they should live like made for each other and any involvement of third people / Guru enter & distances are increasing will come out to the result of death. Best society can be there if we can able to stop this third party involvement and for this we can make a simple & automatic law (1) wife / husband anyone die then the other person has to be in Government custody i.e. that may be jail or a government organizations working centre where male / female are working separately and no links with outsiders. (2) After a time pass of 10/15 years they can marry with person who lives in this places / not outsiders. After they marry they live & make society at campus itself. This should be strictly followed because the antisocial Guru who involved in their separation are keeping such documents / photos made in a room / remote areas will compel them to do antisocial work for these guru for blood of males / deaths. We can create proper jobs in defense or a separate working area for developments / creations for the world / no links with outside. (3) The property of said couple should be the property of the government to run the above sectors. Even all other property should be of government after death of owner, so, that antisocial people cannot take advantage of that & death will be minimize. (4) We should be always take / give better suggestions to think & discuss to reach on ONLY SATYUG / NO MIDLIFE DEATHS & try to apply for children / everybody. (5) Mainly females / Guru should give better & easy suggestions for betterment of all the females also to save a children / husband & wife from a Criminal Guru who gives wrong education to females. (6) Education of Sastras / Ethics should be at schools / colleges and students / teachers / parents should think & discuss for Best World / No Midlife Deaths. (7) Antisocial Guru should feel guilty / ashamed and stop their work. KISHAN JALAN Mobile : 0-98318-22701

Posted by: kishan at March 4, 2008 6:22 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation