IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog
  Institutions
     
  Tanks
     
  Blogs
     
  Mags
     

Monday, July 2, 2007

 
"Child Safety" -- 100 Years Ago vs. Today
(previous | next)
 

Faithful readers will recall that I frequently pen essays responding to calls by politicians or other critics to regulate media content or the Internet "for the children." One of the most intriguing things about these calls to regulate to protect children is that they are seemingly completely devoid of any historical perspective. Politicians or critics either imply or state directly that children are at grave danger from media content or the Internet, but I think we've lost all perspective about what really harms kids.

Cynthia Crossen of The Wall Street Journal has an excellent column on this issue today entitled "Lemonade Stands? Children Used to Toil 14 Hours, Every Day." She notes that:

about a century ago, some two million American children between 10 and 15 years old had "gainful employment," according to census data. And unlike teenagers with summer jobs now, these children often worked 12- or 14-hour days, seven days a week. Most of them worked on family farms, but others were employed in mines, mills, canneries or city streets, polishing shoes, hawking newspapers or delivering messages. They attended school sporadically, if at all.

For industrial employers, young workers were cheap and tractable. They could do simple, repetitive tasks for long hours, and their small size often worked to their advantage. To many people, it seemed as natural for children to work in factories as it did to work alongside their parents planting seeds, washing dishes or milking cows.

That really gives you some appreciation for how far we've come, doesn't it? I'll take the problems we have today versus those of 100 years ago! And I feel the "harm" associated with media content or the Internet is something most parents can handle on their own without resorting to government regulation.

I do not mean to completely belittle concerns about online child safety or access to inappropriate media content -- after all I just wrote a whole book entitled "Parental Controls & Online Child Protection"! But I do think we need to put things in a little perspective when it comes to "child safety" and appreciate the strides we've made.

posted by Adam Thierer @ 9:30 PM | Free Speech , Generic Rant , Online Safety & Parental Controls

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
PFF Blogosphere Archive
Archives by Month
  May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Antitrust
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- Economics
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Privacy
- Software
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Universal Service
- VoIP
- Wireless
- Wireline
Site Feed
  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation The Progress & Freedom Foundation The Progress & Freedom Foundation