IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Media Deconsolidation (Part 17): Clear Channel Station Sell-off
(previous | next)

This is just a quick follow-up to an entry I posted late last year about Clear Channel's possible divestiture of a significant number of its radio stations across America. Now we're getting details and the sell-off is ready to begin. On Wednesday, Clear Channel said it would be selling 362 of its 1,150 radio stations as the company continues to shed assets and go private. Clear Channel hopes to fetch roughly $820 million from the sale of these radio stations. The company is also selling off TV assets. All total, the company expects to divest itself of almost $1.9 billion worth of properties.

As I've said many times before in this ongoing "media deconsolidation series," this is just another sign of how dynamic the media marketplace is. Despite all the hand-wringing we’ve seen over media consolidation in recent years, critics fail to realize that this industry has continued to rapidly evolve, expand and innovate regardless of the ebbs and flows of media ownership patterns. A few years ago, mergers and acquisitions were all the rage. Today, however, a “back-to-basics” strategy is back in vogue that is seeing operators shed assets to figure out how to make customers happy while also weathering the storm of technological changes reshaping the media landscape. In other words, markets work!

But don't expect the media Chicken Littles to say a peep about any of this. They're always too busy concocting their next horror story about how the media sky is about to fall on our heads. This week, it's the Rupert Murdoch offer for the Wall Street Journal. Who knows what it will be tomorrow, but there's always something they want to complain about. Meanwhile, the rest of us are struggling to deal with the avalanche of media options that we're showered with every second of our lives.

Incidentally, even though the media critics have always tried to paint Clear Channel as an evil monopolist that took over the entire radio industry in the late 1990s, the reality was quite different: Clear Channel never owned more than 10 percent of all radio stations in America. Some monopoly! And now that they are selling almost 400 of their stations, that percentage of the overall pie is going to plummet.

Finally, it remains to be seen if those smaller, rural stations that Clear Channel is divesting can survive on their own. The media critics have always wanted such stations to be independent of larger media conglomerates, but in today's hyper-competitive media marketplace, the future of free, over-the-air radio is uncertain. In particular, it is very unclear if small, rural radio station groups can make it in this new environment. Ironically, therefore, we might see the day very soon when policy makers and media critics alike are longing for the days when larger companies like Clear Channel helped support--even subsidize--the existence of smaller market operators.

But regardless of who owns what or how big they are, the FCC and Congress need to fully deregulate these markets and let broadcasters do whatever it takes to survive. The outdated ownership rules and market caps that continue to constrain sensible market deals need to all go. Antitrust law will always exist should concerns about market power arise. But, again, in today’s world of cut-throat competition for our eyes and ears, one wonders why any regulation of the media marketplace is needed at all.

posted by Adam Thierer @ 10:50 PM | Mass Media

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly


Thanks for posting this from Technology Liberation Front. It goes to show that there is no harm in updating the media ownership rules. I am helping out the national association of broadcasters and when so much is changing, local tv and radio stations need to be able to compete with all that's out there. The FCC has has the opportunity to level the playing field.

Posted by: Matt at May 4, 2007 2:22 PM

'[O]ne wonders why any regulation of the media marketplace is needed at all' - but presumably a system of private ownership backed by the law of contracts and related legal sanctions IS a form of regulation - just a different type. You can prefer one type of regulation to the other, but both are forms of governance / ordering with government involvement.

Posted by: Anon at May 11, 2007 11:45 AM

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation