IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog
  Institutions
     
  Tanks
     
  Blogs
     
  Mags
     

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

 
Advertised vs Actual Bandwidth Across Countries
(previous | next)
 

Today many worry about two aspects of broadband in the U.S. when compared to other countries -- its adoption rate by consumers and available speeds (bandwidth). Comparable data across countries is difficult to obtain. The OECD and ITU publish cross-country adoption rates, but provide little information on how they come up with their estimates. Data on available speeds is even more problematic, given the number of providers and plans in many countries.

A new report released by Analysys Consulting Group and funded by AT&T sheds new light on the issue of broadband speeds across countries. The report finds that advertised speeds are typically higher than actual available speeds, and that the gap increases as advertised speeds increase. For example, according to the report,

The report suggests that actual speeds, as opposed to advertised speeds, seem to be fairly similar across advanced countries.

advertise_actual_analysys.jpg

A problem with the analysis is that it only partially explains the methodology. For example, did testers in each country use similar equipment? How many tests were done in each country that were averaged into a country-wide estimate? What share of consumers have access to the tested service? What do providers charge for those services?

Nonetheless, despite its problems this study makes an important contribution to the question of how to compare bandwidth available to consumers across countries.

posted by Scott Wallsten @ 2:04 PM | Broadband

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  Cato Unbound Debate: Lessig's Code at Ten (Part 1: Declan's Lead Essay)
The "Firstness" of the First Amendment
Supreme Court Decision in FCC v. Fox (Part 6: Other Articles & Opinions)
Supreme Court Decision in FCC v. Fox (Part 5: The Dissents)
Schneier on Data Collection and "Deception"
NTIA names Online Safety Technical Working Group members
Supreme Court Decision in FCC v. Fox (Part 4: The Thomas Concurrence)
Supreme Court Decision in FCC v. Fox (Part 3: The Majority Decision)
Supreme Court Decision in FCC v. Fox (Part 2: Initial Thoughts)
Supreme Court Decision in FCC v. Fox (Part 1: The Decision)
Archives by Month
  May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Advertising
- Antitrust
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Podcasts
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- VoIP
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation