IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Advertised vs Actual Bandwidth Across Countries
(previous | next)

Today many worry about two aspects of broadband in the U.S. when compared to other countries -- its adoption rate by consumers and available speeds (bandwidth). Comparable data across countries is difficult to obtain. The OECD and ITU publish cross-country adoption rates, but provide little information on how they come up with their estimates. Data on available speeds is even more problematic, given the number of providers and plans in many countries.

A new report released by Analysys Consulting Group and funded by AT&T sheds new light on the issue of broadband speeds across countries. The report finds that advertised speeds are typically higher than actual available speeds, and that the gap increases as advertised speeds increase. For example, according to the report,

The report suggests that actual speeds, as opposed to advertised speeds, seem to be fairly similar across advanced countries.


A problem with the analysis is that it only partially explains the methodology. For example, did testers in each country use similar equipment? How many tests were done in each country that were averaged into a country-wide estimate? What share of consumers have access to the tested service? What do providers charge for those services?

Nonetheless, despite its problems this study makes an important contribution to the question of how to compare bandwidth available to consumers across countries.

posted by Scott Wallsten @ 2:04 PM | Broadband

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation