IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

The New Independent ICANN
(previous | next)

The US Department of Commerce has recently taken additional steps to establish an independent ICANN. Some have heralded this as a step away from undue U.S. influence over ICANN, and a step towards real independence.

But I must admit I'm skeptical that ICANN independence will result in realizing benefits from genuine market forces, as opposed to a power vacuum that Europeans and other officials will step into aggressively. But I haven't followed the specefic terms of their latest agreement. Comments?

Here's some more specefics about my concern: it seems to me that for an independent ICANN to realize market forces, it needs competition, or, barring that in the short run, some other kind of accounatability to the user community, particularly in the private sector. The voting and committees established early on don't seem to have gotten us there. A good many decisions were made by the board in closed sessions. But my information might simply be out of date... did they change something fundemental? If they didn't, I'm afraid that an independent ICANN will turn out to be a sort of international Post Office.

Another way of asking the same thing: if ICANN manages the domain system in a stupid way, what are the consequences for them? Bad press? Do they lose a customer? Does a product fail? Does someone get fired? Sued? Do they take a hit in their stock price? Revenues? Can ICANN go out of business? Eventually enough annoyed people get together and figure out an alternative to the domain name system? Search engines have somewhat diminished the importance of domain names, but how much pressure does this place on ICANN?

posted by Solveig Singleton @ 1:36 PM | E-commerce

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation