IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

UK Censors Tom & Jerry Cartoons
(previous | next)

Oh brother, I have heard some pretty silly censorship tales in my time, but this one is a real doozy. Last week, U.K. telecom and media regulator Ofcom announced that, in the wake of an investigation prompted by the anonymous viewer's complaint, it had pressured the children's cable TV channel Boomerang to edit out scenes in two "Tom & Jerry" cartoons that were deemed to glamorize or condone smoking. "We note that, in 'Tom and Jerry', smoking usually appears in a stylised manner and is frequently not condoned," reported Ofcom.

Tom and Jerry.jpg

The complaint focused on two episodes -- "Texas Tom" and "Tennis Chumps." I seem to remember them from childhood, but my memory is a little fuzzy, so here's a description from The Guardian: "In Texas Tom, Tom tries to impress a female cat by making a rollup cigarette while Tennis Chumps sees Tom's opponent in a match smoking a large cigar."

Now look, I hate smoking as much as the next guy these days, and I can even sympathize with concerns about kids being exposed to excessive tobacco advertising (although I would still never call upon governments to ban it entirely, as many did long ago). But what we are talking about here are two very short clips of cartoon characters briefly smoking. Do the UK regulators imagine that after seeing those fleeting glimpses of tobacco use in just those two episodes that kids will make a mad dash for mom's purse, steal her cash, and run down to the corner store to try to buy some smokes (illegally, I might add)?

Come on, let's be real. It would be one thing if every "Tom & Jerry" episode included multiple scenes of tobacco use. Perhaps then the regulators would have something to get worked up about. But two fleeting scenes in just two episodes out of the hundreds of episodes that were made? They felt the need to censor that?

Incidentally, I guess we'll just ignore all the shovels or iron anvils that are continuously and quite violently dropping on poor Tom, flattening his head or entire body. And I'll guess we'll ignore Tom's sinister plots to eat not only little Jerry, but also every innocent creature around him (usually fuzzy little ducklings who've recently lost their mommas). And, on a more serious note, I'll guess we'll ignore the blatant racial stereotyping at play when Mammy Two-Shoes is brought into the script or when Tom appears in blackface make-up in some episodes. Yeah, let's just ignore all that and focus on two random shots of smoking and censor them to "protect the children."

How utterly absurd.

Here's a reality check for UK regulators: Kids are still going to see real people smoking in the real world and what two animated characters were (very briefly) doing in two short spots in a 50-year-old cartoon isn't really going to amount to a hill of beans. And, by the way, how long to do you think it will be before these episodes pop on YouTube or other video sharing sites and kids just start watching them there simply because you have taken this silly step?

But that gets to my final question: Who the heck even watches Tom & Jerry cartoons anymore?! My kids certainly don't. Now if Dora the Explorer ever starts lighting up, give me a call back!

posted by Adam Thierer @ 11:36 AM | Free Speech

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly


Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation