IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Data Protection Looms: What Price Preemption?
(previous | next)

Security breaches involving the loss or theft of massive amounts of personal data have revived the call on Capitol Hill for some kind of security bill to preempt inconsistent action by the roughly 30 states now considering bills related to consumer data. Unfortunately, the whole furor has moved in the direction of reviving legislative interest in European-style data protection rules, which would broadly regulate the collection and use of consumer information by legitimate businesses.

This would be a very bad thing. People acting in the economy need information about other people to make good decisions. Startups and new businesses in particular, especially those going up against an established competitor who already has established consumer relationships,

need to know about the potential market for their product. Consumers need information too. Empirical studies have show how advertising and marketing help keep product quality high and prices low; even though ads are biased, they do give consumers basic information such as the name of the product and what it does, letting them know about alternatives. Furthermore, it would not improve security, because the theft of data is a problem quite distinct from the legitimate use of data in product development. Restricting the use of social security numbers as identifiers would increase the confusion of accounts with identical names.

It is hard for businesses to contend with 50 different inconsistent state laws. But adopting the European model would be a drastic mistake for consumers and small business.

For more, see

Is It Time to Play Russian Roulette on Privacy?

Comments Submitted to the FTC/NTIA Workshop on Online Profiling

With a Grain of Salt: What Consumer Privacy Studies Don't Tell Us

Privacy as a Trade Issue: Guidelines for US Negotiators

Privacy in a Free Country: In Search of Reasonable Principles

Privacy and Human Rights: Comparing the United States to Europe

More Privacy Paternalism: The Paranoid's Veto

Privacy and Free Speech in the Political Landscape

posted by Solveig Singleton @ 11:37 AM | Capitol Hill , E-commerce , Privacy , Privacy

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation