IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Thursday, November 3, 2005

State and Localities Put on Notice
(previous | next)

This afternoon the FCC voted 4-0 to initiate an NPRM "to ensure [a] reasonable franchising process for new video market entrants." The announcement is timely and in keeping with Chairman Martin's announced interest in the topic from early in the summer. Increasingly, state legislatures have shown interest in the process and this year there was activity in New Jersey, Virginia and Texas on the issue.

It is quite possible that Congressional action may supersede the Commission's investigation, but at this time, building a record about what actually happens where the rubber meets the road is a useful role for the Commission. Tip of the hat to Chairman Martin for taking this step. Among its other effects, the NPRM should help explain the limits of the Commission's authority on the matter. And as the title of this entry suggests, it puts others on notice that the Chairman is resourceful in his efforts to promote broadband deployment and competition. Finally, the NPRM is an opportunity to sort the rhetoric from the legal and economic realities of the marketplace. To date, my chief complaint with the debate over franchise regulation is the unnecessary and unhelpful conflation of right-of-way law and franchise law. One consensus-based approach, and very sensible to my mind, on how to sort through these issues is here.

posted by @ 6:37 PM | Broadband , Cable , State Policy , The FCC

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation