IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, July 29, 2005

A Bouquet for the Commission
(previous | next)

News broke this afternoon that President Bush will nominate White House advisor Richard Russell and Director Deborah Taylor Tate of the Tennessee Regulatory Authority to the FCC. I know nothing of Mr. Russell and something of Debi and therefore will limit these comments to her (potential/pending/likely?) nomination.

Debi will be good for the Commission and the Administration won't likely be disappointed. She is amply qualified and has a variety of public sector experiences. She has worked for Governor (now Senator) Alexander and Governor Sundquist in legal and policy roles. Debi spearheaded the use of statistical mapping to improve Tennessee's juvenile justice system. Perhaps this portends good omens for USF reform - she succeeded by reforming entrenched bureaucratic interests through the use of data and technology to target services to those in need.

Debi also maintains a close relationship with the public policy institute at Vanderbilt after working there for a couple years before her appointment to the TRA. (WARNING: Self-Serving Sentence to Follow.) As a result, I have found she - much more so that the typical state regulator - has shown a keen interest and appreciation for the value brought to the policy debate by academics and think tanks.

Despite these experiences, I suspect that if (when) confirmed, Commissioner Tate will be shocked at the level of lobbying and viciousness that comes with owning turf on the "8th Floor". No shrinking violet and certainly not naive in the ways of Washington, I worry for my friend from Tennessee in light of the great challenges before the Commission and Congress. Despite her calm manner and training as a mediator, it won't be long before "friends" call into question her loyalty, intelligence or motives when she votes "against" their point of view. This is as inevitable as it is sad.

The nomination of Deborah Taylor Tate to the Commission signals the Administration's seriousness about staying the course in the difficult transition from intensive economic regulation toward a healthy digital communications marketplace. Director Tate has been leader in Tennesee - for example, as Chairman she was quick to identify the importance of VoIP and the challenges it presents - and among her peers. Surely the addition of Debi's voice to the Commission will strengthen ongoing efforts to properly limit the reach of regulation.

Early this week, Chairman Martin addressed the annual NARUC meeting. He outlined three broad areas of work for the Commission: broadband, universal service and interconnection. He'll need help to make headway on these issues and with Debi Tate on board, I believe we'll all be better off.

posted by @ 2:11 PM | Capitol Hill , State Policy , The FCC

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation