IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Thursday, March 24, 2005

Aspen Conference Kicks Off Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics
(previous | next)

While D.C. basked in the first convincing evidence that Spring will soon take hold, a group of Congressional staffers crunched through repeated dustings of snow on their way to classes in Aspen, Colorado. The staffers were few in number but decidedly well-placed and bipartisan, representing key committees and offices in both the House and Senate. They had agreed to devote part of their Easter recess to participate in the Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics, hosted at the famed Aspen Institute. The Federal Institute was modeled after a similar program for state regulators that PFF launched successfully last year, in conjunction with our academic partners at the University of Colorado's Silicon Flatirons Telecommunications Program and George Mason University's Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science.

The Federal Institute differs from PFF's usual think-tank activities (i.e., research and writing on specific policy issues in an effort to persuade policymakers). It is a "mini-university" designed to help Congressional staffers develop analytical tools that they can use to make up their own minds regarding policies in industries significantly affected by regulation (e.g., communications, electricity and intellectual property). The conference last weekend was no ski junket; it was rigorous, but fun. Each session involved lively discussions on essential economic and technology concepts, supplemented by readings that constitute "classics" in these areas. Attendees considered both the theory and reality of regulation. They explored the importance of assessing technology and market developments, of understanding property rights and liabilities, and of recognizing political and institutional limitations.

But this first Aspen conference for the Federal Institute accomplished much more, at least for me personally. I owe a great deal to the attendees for opening my eyes to how these analytical principles can be applied outside the communications and information technology sectors with which I am most familiar. More importantly, they renewed my faith that substantive rigor can play an important role in the legislative process, at least with respect to public servants this dedicated. And clearly the staffers appreciated the experience, one stating: "I enjoyed this more than any trip I have done in 10 years on the Hill."

Best of all, there is more to come with the Federal Institute, with a visit to George Mason's experimental economics lab in early May, as well as other events in DC and at the Aspen Institute. For more information on the program, please see the program's website.

posted by Kyle Dixon @ 7:36 PM | Capitol Hill , Communications , Economics , Electricity , Events , General , IP , Think Tanks

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation