IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Monday, February 7, 2005

Cato Panel on Telecom Reform
(previous | next)

This afternoon Cato put on a provocative Capitol Hill briefing on the need for telecom reform. In contrast to PFF's own effort to bring together varied viewpoints on this subject, this panel included speakers who followed roughly similar sheets of music. The discussion was lively and colorful, in part based on the involvement of several well-established commentators: George Gilder and John Wohlstetter of Discovery Insitute and Adam Thierer of Cato.

To oversimplify, speakers appeared to make the following points: (1) the U.S. is way behind other countries in deployment of broadband and other advanced services because we failed to deregulate; (2) part of that failure resulted from ambiguities in the statute, but the lion's share resulted from missteps by the FCC (e.g., promoting "fake" competition via unbundling of the incumbent's entire network, allowing state/local involvement in regulation, inadequate use of forbearance and preemption authority); and (3) only sweeping deregulation can correct these problems, at the very least with respect to broadband and other "new" services and technologies. Speakers also appeared to agree that adequate deregulation would require both a better statute and a significantly reformed and limited FCC. Interestingly, the only area in which the speakers felt the FCC had gone reasonably far toward their preferred approach was spectrum policy, with several speakers praising efforts to reduce command-and-control regulation and experimentation with different models of spectrum allocation.

Although the discussion could have benefited from more disagreement among speakers, it did provide a good sketch of at least the "free market" imperatives for reform. (Presumably, similar events around town will offer views that instead embrace ongoing government involvement in communications.) That said, the discussion offered few concrete suggestions on how to help these or other policy views navigate the political thicket in Congress. At most, speakers expressed an understanding that universal service could not be eliminated altogether even if they wanted to do so, as well as a general willingness to avoid media issues in this round of reform.

Hopefully, these sorts of political considerations can factor more prominently in future discussions, as interest in telecom reform continues to heat up on Capitol Hill and elsewhere among policy circles. If not, the "right answers" -- whatever proponents believe those are -- may fall victim to politics as usual.

posted by Kyle Dixon @ 9:54 PM | Communications

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation