IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

Telephone Taxes in '05
(previous | next)

A Wall Street Journal editorial pulls together the threads of three distinct digital tax issues under the heading "A National Telephone Tax?" (Subscription required) As one might expect, the editorial board at the WSJ does not favor a new national telephone tax. In addition to the market distortions it would present, the WSJ presents persuasive data on a rising tide of state revenues. Economic growth tends to increase tax receipts even when the taxman cannot reach new technologies.

However, the distinct issues are serious enough to warrant their own treatment. First there is the issue of state and local taxes on Internet-based calling. According to the WSJ, states are on the offensive on this point and rightly see the traditional tax base in decline insofar as taxes were levied on traditional telephone service. VoIP bedevils state officials on the jurisdictional issues that dominate regulatory policy as well as the pending decline of tax revenues built into the old system. How many firehouses will be shuttered because cities have not figured out how to tax VoIP? (Not many...unless you live exclusively in the land of outlandish rhetoric.)

Second, there are the manifold problems associated with "streamlined use tax" proposals. In effect, it is a cartel for state revenue officers. Finally, there is the recently enacted Internet Tax Non-Discrimination Act. This "Internet tax freedom" act only temporarily extended the prohibition on Internet access taxes and the like. Watch for the intersection of technology and taxation in the New Year; in one way or another we are bound for a collision as these issues gain traction.

posted by @ 2:50 PM | Communications

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation