IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Saturday, October 16, 2004

FCC Reform Blogsplosion II: A Question I Didn't Get to Ask Susan Ness
(previous | next)

Former FCC Commissioner Susan Ness argued on behalf of the "leave it alone" coalition, or to be more generous, "it ain't that broke, so doesn't need that much of a fix."

She argued for leaving the Commission as an independent fourth branch agency, keeping the number of commissioners at 5, and noted that the Hundt FCC post-96 Act moved with dispatch to meet its congressionally-mandated deadlines. This was largely in opposition to Randy May's proposal to move the Commission into the executive branch, reduce the number of commissioners to 3 or even 1.

She argued against putting the FCC into the executive branch because of fears of political influences. My question would have been: The FCC is already a hyper-politica l organization, why not just ratify that reality be making it accountable to the executive? Chairman Hundt, who Commissioner Ness served with, openly brags in his memoir about his constant contact with the White House. The media ownership proceeding last year was nothing but political mau-mauing, with Commissioner Copps in particular both fomenting and celebrating the mob opinion surrounding that decision. As Randy May pointed out, media ownership ends up being a quintessential political question -- one that you normally would not give to an appointed "expert" agency.

posted by Ray Gifford @ 3:38 PM | The FCC

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation