IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Thursday, September 16, 2004

 
Adventures in Hot Cuts
(previous | next)
 

For those calling PFF in the last 24 hours and receiving a "this number is out of service" message or just non-stop ringing, we apologize as the porting process appears to have been handled by Moe, Larry and Curly, with an assist from Shemp, who worked for our old carrier. That'll teach us to go with the low cost option... Oh, and the carrier "forgot" to port our direct dial numbers, so everyone calling today gets the added pleasure of talking to our delightfult receptionist, Marcia.

I trust that ultimately this will get worked out to our satisfaction. If not, the beauty of a competitive market will allow us choice to find a better carrier. That said, CLEC-to-CLEC porting (as in this case) is governed, at best, by the interconnection agreements between those carriers, if there is one. More often, the porting needs to involve the incumbent, whose recompense for this process is below their costs (TELRIC non-recurring costs can get preposterously low--assume non-union robots in an automated porting process and pay the incumbent that!). For the end-user, as PFF now knows rather pointedly, this is a crucial but non-transparent process. You don't even know who to scream at--it might be your new carrier's fault, your old carrier's fault, or some third-party's.

My strong preference here still is to have the regulatory process retreat from this area and allow contract to work it out. The regulatory process will not for historical reasons countenance remedies like expectation damages for harmed consumers. A market might offer this term, particularly to businesses willing to pay for it. Likewise, the coordination problems between carriers are real and non-trivial, but the compensation each pays the other is regulated. Finally, the incentives between the carriers are askew. The losing carrier has little incentive to execute the port properly -- they are losing a customer, after all. I would think contract mechanisms might be better at solving this temporal externality problem than regulation.

This is the tortured thinking that just changing your phone company inspires. Pity me.

posted by Ray Gifford @ 9:34 AM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation