IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, May 21, 2004

Building an Empire: The Vonage Vote
(previous | next)

Wednesday the New York PSC determined that Vonage is a "telephone corporation." The result: more regulation. Vonage will be classified as a competitive provider and must apply for a certificate to authorize their services. As a condition of certification, Vonage is required file a schedule of its rates.

A few comments about this development: First, the PSC took action in response to a complaint lodged by a regulated competitor. When a firm cannot do something in the marketplace to improve its position, the political arena is a very enticing way to hurt the other guy. Second, the Commission took pains to forebear from extensive economic regulation and "to defer any regulatory requirements for a reasonable period to permit Vonage to apply for a CPCN and file rate schedules." During this 45-day period Vonage can apply for waivers from their regulatory obligation. This begs the question: why regulate Vonage today if waivers are possible tomorrow? (Empire building, perhaps.)

My third reaction is actually a prediction. In the rhetorical debate between the "Must Regulate Now" and "Don't Regulate the Internet" crowds, memory of the relatively light regulatory touch applied by the NY PSC will quickly fade and the decision will become a rhetorical feather to the cap of the pro-regulation folks.

Finally, the Chairman's reference (page two) to the terrorism attacks on September 11, 2001 is tone deaf. The same day that former Mayor Guiliani testified on national television about New York's state of preparedness and emergency responders, the Chairman cited network reliability as a reason to expand the reach of his agency. Perhaps the comment had nothing to do with Guiliani. Perhaps it had nothing to do with Tuesday's release of a staff report from the 9/11 Commission that alleged evidence of communications foul-ups in the city's immediate response to the attacks. Regardless, the circumstances create the impression of bureaucratic opportunism. This is unfortunate for everyone.

In a less emotionally charged atmosphere it is easy to see the difference between sustaining reliable networks and how emergency responders use a network and organize their activities. But in light of this week's events, the network reliability comments were either ill timed and unfortunate or they were an attempt to score political points while building a regulatory empire. I assume it was the former.

News.com had the story on the Vonage vote and Pulver has a post as well.

posted by @ 12:38 PM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation