IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, April 23, 2004

CA PUC Brinkmanship -- Can the States Torpedo 'Negotiate not Litigate'?
(previous | next)

The California PUC has laid down the gauntlet to SBC and Sage Telecom to file their interconnection agreement under section 252 of the Telecommunication Act. The letter is here.

To my understanding, both SBC and Sage have refused to do so, Sage going so far as to say it will rescind the agreement if it has to be filed. Qwest and Verizon have also publicly stated that they will resist any directions to file with the states.

I am not wholly unsympathetic to the state position here, to the extent they are inclined to do things by rote. If it looks like an interconnection arrangement, then they think they have the right to review it. However, the states are missing that this insistence on filing -- much like the pick and choose rule -- utterly destroys any incentives for parties to reach privately negotiated arrangements. If everything must be filed and subject to an abstract "non-discrimination" requirement, then nothing can be negotiated in advance by the parties. In the end, the incumbent in particular can do nothing but come up with a single, standard "take it or leave it" standard offer.

Of course, a cynic would say that this is exactly what the states want -- to prevent any private negotiation and keep their hands deeply involved in a regulatory/supervisory process where they dictate the interconnection rights, terms and prices. Oh, wait, I am a cynic.

posted by Ray Gifford @ 3:29 PM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation