IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Friday, March 26, 2004

Rural Broadband
(previous | next)

Recently, the USDA awarded $11.3 million in community broadband grants to 34 communities in 20 states, a far cry from the $1.4 billion in loans and loan guarantees to rural telecom providers promised by Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman in 2002. The purpose of these grants is to spur the technological development in rural America, which comprises 75% of the nations land, but only 25% of the population. The 2002 Farm Security and Rural Investment Act also included $20 million in federal funds to finance rural broadband. While providing the entire country with up-to-date broadband solutions is a noble endeavor, it is one best left to private enterprise. As demonstrated by Tom's paper on municipal ownership of telecom, it is in the best interest of the taxpayer and the consumer for government to allow private enterprise to build and provide broadband solutions. For government to involve itself in an industry as uncertain and competitive as telecommunications makes little sense.

Bush actually sees these grant programs as pork barrel spending and much to the chagrin of the Wireless Communication Association and the FTTH Council. In a speech in New Mexico today, Bush spoke on the importance of affordable broadband access to all Americans, but omitted any mention of federal funding, which begs the question "who will pay for this?"

posted by Mike Pickford @ 3:47 PM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation