IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Tuesday, December 16, 2003

Blame Canada
(previous | next)

The IP press over last weekend headlined a conclusion by the Canadian Copyright Board that downloading songs from the Internet is legal, as long as the purpose is to create a copy for personal use. "Blame Canada" said the LA Times, obviously a nest of Southpark fans.

The reasoning was technical. A 1998 (pre-Napster) Canadian law creates this right, and says nothing that would limit the source of the copy. QED, downloading is legal. The Board split the baby by noting that uploading to the Internet remains illegal.

The Canadian Recording Industry Association will appeal to the courts, but it is not really a significant loss, and would have little impact even if transferred to the U.S. The music industry's enforcement strategy is to disrupt uploading, not crucify downloaders. A swapping system in which no one uploads and everyone tries to free ride is just ducky from the industry's perspective. It would even build markets for the legitimate services that are rapidly coming on line.

The more interesting part of the decision is the contortions the CCB must go through to supervise Canada's system of taxing hardware and blank media to create a fund to compensate artists for their losses to this right of private copying. Academia in the U.S. has become entranced by the idea of such non-market systems. But watching the Canadians struggle with rates, coverages (e.g., iPods but not hard drives), exemptions and other issues raised by the 1,500 commenters on the proposed levies should make them pause. Markets and pay-for-what-you-take have simplicity and moral clarity, qualities not found in any administrative proceeding that I have ever seen, and certainly not in this one.

posted by James DeLong @ 10:51 AM | General

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:

Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.

The Progress & Freedom Foundation