IPcentral Weblog
  The DACA Blog

Saturday, January 21, 2006

 
The Economist on King Content
(previous | next)
 

The Economist's main editorial this week is on the challenges, and opportunities, that digitization gives to content companies. Noting the malaise in content companies equity prices, the migration of advertising revenues to the Internet, the decline in movie ticket and DVD sales, The Economist notes that the digitized, networked economy is hitting the content industries in the core of their business model. This seems right, and furthermore, the winds have yet to hit gale force, which they inevitably will.

At the same time, the editorial notes the remarkable staying power of content and the content companies' being good at marshaling the capital and creative talent to produce high quality (at least in production values, if not actual content) entertainment. In short, content is what people are willing to pay for over those high speed connections, and it is not likely that a garage entrepreneur is going to produce and create the next blockbuster film or TV series.

The business model is being challenged. As I noted yesterday, the irony of the a la carte regulatory debate is that the broadband Internet is the ultimate a la carte-bringing market machine. The task in the policy world will be to do no harm – and impose no premature restrictions – on different contractual and pricing mechanisms as they emerge and are tried.

To lose the subtlety of my point, this means: no net neutrality, no a la carte, no mandates and contract restrictions absent tangible, proven consumer harm.

posted by Ray Gifford @ 4:26 PM | A La Carte , Broadband , IP

Share |

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly

Post a Comment:





 
Blog Main
RSS Feed  
Recent Posts
  EFF-PFF Amicus Brief in Schwarzenegger v. EMA Supreme Court Videogame Violence Case
New OECD Study Finds That Improved IPR Protections Benefit Developing Countries
Hubris, Cowardice, File-sharing, and TechDirt
iPhones, DRM, and Doom-Mongers
"Rogue Archivist" Carl Malamud On How to Fix Gov2.0
Coping with Information Overload: Thoughts on Hamlet's BlackBerry by William Powers
How Many Times Has Michael "Dr. Doom" Copps Forecast an Internet Apocalypse?
Google / Verizon Proposal May Be Important Compromise, But Regulatory Trajectory Concerns Many
Two Schools of Internet Pessimism
GAO: Wireless Prices Plummeting; Public Knowledge: We Must Regulate!
Archives by Month
  September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  - (see all)
Archives by Topic
  - A La Carte
- Add category
- Advertising & Marketing
- Antitrust & Competition Policy
- Appleplectics
- Books & Book Reviews
- Broadband
- Cable
- Campaign Finance Law
- Capitalism
- Capitol Hill
- China
- Commons
- Communications
- Copyright
- Cutting the Video Cord
- Cyber-Security
- DACA
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- Digital TV
- E-commerce
- e-Government & Transparency
- Economics
- Education
- Electricity
- Energy
- Events
- Exaflood
- Free Speech
- Gambling
- General
- Generic Rant
- Global Innovation
- Googlephobia
- Googlephobia
- Human Capital
- Innovation
- Intermediary Deputization & Section 230
- Internet
- Internet Governance
- Internet TV
- Interoperability
- IP
- Local Franchising
- Mass Media
- Media Regulation
- Monetary Policy
- Municipal Ownership
- Net Neutrality
- Neutrality
- Non-PFF Podcasts
- Ongoing Series
- Online Safety & Parental Controls
- Open Source
- PFF
- PFF Podcasts
- Philosophy / Cyber-Libertarianism
- Privacy
- Privacy Solutions
- Regulation
- Search
- Security
- Software
- Space
- Spectrum
- Sports
- State Policy
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- The FCC
- The FTC
- The News Frontier
- Think Tanks
- Trade
- Trademark
- Universal Service
- Video Games & Virtual Worlds
- VoIP
- What We're Reading
- Wireless
- Wireline
Archives by Author
PFF Blogosphere Archives
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.
 










The Progress & Freedom Foundation